The Board of Control for Cricket in India's annual general meeting, scheduled for Sept. 21, "could mark the beginning of a significant period for Indian cricket administration," according to THE HINDU. Once it was "revealed that the election of the secretary was on the agenda," the Lodha panel had clarified that the BCCI AGM "could not conduct any business" about '16-17. If "it does that, it could be construed as contempt of court." However, based on external legal advice, including that of former Supreme Court judge Markandeya Katju, "the BCCI has decided to continue with the AGM and make all the routine appointments as per its existing rules and regulations." The Supreme Court on July 18 had ordered the BCCI to adopt reforms, including a new administrative set-up and rules and regulations in "four, at the most six months." However, the BCCI "has continued to take the apex court head on" and has not only filed a review petition against the order but has also asked Chief Justice of India T.S. Thakur, who was a member of the two-judge bench that delivered the landmark verdict, "to recuse himself from the review petition" (THE HINDU, 9/18).