49ers Replace Sod At Levi's Stadium Lambeau Field Rolls Out New Gameday Food Cavs, Indians Get Public Funds Approved UNC Keeps Smith Center Renovations On Hold Bruins Eye Corporate Events At New Facility Raptors Need One More Vote For Practice Facility Levi's Stadium Dealing With Sod Issues College Facility Notes College Football HOF To Open On Budget Legends-Forest City Deal For Nassau Breaks Down
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/December 9, 2013/Facilities
Braves Make Pitch To Real Estate Developers For New Ballpark, Ask For Quick Response
Published December 9, 2013
TED TALK: In Atlanta, Wenk & Sams report the redevelopment of the Turner Field site after the Braves leave "could match or exceed in scope downtown’s two other major makeovers" -- Underground Atlanta in the '80s and Centennial Olympic Park in the '90s. At the "center of whatever happens at Turner Field will be Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed, whose political legacy could be tarnished by losing the Braves and possibly tearing down a city icon" in Turner Field. Possibilities include a "development that would uplift the surrounding neighborhoods such as Summerhill, which have suffered in the stadium's shadow." Although Reed in November announced that Turner Field "would be knocked down and a middle-class development would be built in its place -- plans are far from final." One possibility is that Georgia State Univ. "could acquire Turner Field to house its growing athletic program," and a "more exciting option could be to transform Turner Field into a residential and retail development, keeping portions of the stadium facade to preserve the city's Olympic legacy." City residents "seem to favor low-density residential and retail development in place of Turner Field" (ATLANTA BUSINESS CHRONICLE, 12/6 issue).
PLAYING POLITICS: CNBC’s Becky Quick noted a "battle is brewing” between the Braves and the Tea Party over public funds for the team’s new ballpark. CNBC's Andrew Ross Sorkin said public funds are okay to be used for sports venues "if you can actually proves it makes money." But Sorkin said the "problem … is it usually doesn’t work." Quick said the Republican party in this case “is saying that yes, it is going to bring in a lot of economic activity over the next 30 years and so they think it’s a win for Cobb County. But if you go back and you look at the history of these things a lot of times it doesn’t turn out to be that way." Sorkin said there does seem to be "some behind-the-scenes shenanigans because it came to vote without a true airing" of the whole plan, "but more broadly this is what governments do." CNBC's Joe Kernen said when a "city is able to keep and attract a professional sports team it almost seems like it's not totally just private enterprise. It seems like it's partly associated with the municipality where it is" ("Squawk Box," CNBC, 12/9).