ADs Address Cost-Of-Attendance Issues UNC, Wake Schedule Non-Conference Games Houston AD Pushes For "National Relevancy" Michigan's Harbaugh Ensured Scheduled Raises Colleges Give Cost-Of-Attendance Stipends Mizzou, Nebraska Will Pay Cost-Of-Attendance Univ. Of Minnesota Fast-Tracking Sports Project Kent State To Review Athletics Program Q&A With New Fresno State AD Jim Bartko Power Five Pass Cost-Of-Attendance Measure
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/January 13, 2012/Colleges
Five Questions With FBA Chair Tina Kunzer-Murphy
Published January 13, 2012
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
Q: After this season, what concerns do you have about the bowl system?
Kunzer-Murphy: I’m concerned about the rhetoric in the media about changing the system that could evolve into something that adversely affects the bowl system long term. What most people fail to think about is how a change to the system will affect the student athlete. Each year, 7,000 student athletes take part in many diverse and unique opportunities at bowl games. If the system is dramatically changed, the student athletes wouldn’t otherwise have an opportunity to partake in these experiences.
Q: What do you think is the future for the BCS?
Kunzer-Murphy: The BCS is controlled by the conferences. The future will be determined by the commissioners. I can say this. The BCS was created to pit No. 1 vs. No. 2. Overall, I think the current system has done a remarkable job of matching the two best teams in college football every year. It’s also given some programs the opportunity to play on major stages that they otherwise might not have had the opportunity to do so before the BCS.
Q: In terms of the number of games, sponsorships and regaining confidence of the college sports fans, where do you see growth for the overall bowl system?
Kunzer-Murphy: The NCAA has determined that 35 bowl games are the right number for eligible teams to have an opportunity to participate in the bowl experience. Again, we had over 1.8 million fans attend bowl games this year. Despite the economic issues our country faces, college football has never been more popular, and the bowls are a big part of college football.
Q: Ratings and attendance were down this year, what are your thoughts on why and how can they be increased for next year?
Kunzer-Murphy: First of all, attendance was down marginally. Compare bowls to major professional sports, and you will see that attendance in other sports dropped by a greater percentage compared to bowls. Last year, our TV ratings were up. There are lots of factors that affect TV ratings. Obviously, we all strive to put together the most compelling match-ups based on the inventory of teams we have to pick from. Some years are better than others.
Q: People are saying there may be too many bowl games, including Mountain West Conference Commissioner Craig Thompson. Is this something you often hear?
Kunzer-Murphy: The number of bowl games is determined by the basic supply and demand associated with bowl-eligible teams. The requirements for bowl eligibility are set by the conferences and NCAA, and as such, we do not make the rules when it comes to what record a team must be to become bowl eligible. If the conferences decide they want to change the eligibility requirements, it will affect the number of bowls. It’s pretty simple.