Brickyard 400 Rebounds From Low '15 Audience Bettman Denies CTE-Concussions Link Big Ten's Delany Hints At Retirement SMU Spending $150M On New Football Facilities HBO's "Real Sports" Hones In On IOC MLS Execs Hosting Technology Event In San Jose Jordan Breaks Silence On Recent Social Unrest Sale Says White Sox Put Business Ahead Of Winning Borders Addresses WNBA Fines Yahoo Sports To Use Current Name For Now
Federal Appeals Court Upholds Dismissal Of NFLPA Marketing Case
Published April 2, 2014
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
The Grant case was filed on behalf of retirees who had not signed licensing agreements. The Ninth Circuit ruled that in the case of Grant, Roberts and Parrish, they were certainly not entitled to a duty from the union because they had not paid dues under the period covered by the lawsuit. The court’s four-judge panel ruled that “none of the appellants, including Cobb and Jones, produced evidence showing that they had a right to control the NFLPA’s alleged activities on their behalf.”