From the Field of Marketing Cartoon: Rio in the rearview From The Executive Editor: Ivan Pollard How you see it: Esports not sports From The Executive Editor: Summer of ’16 Cartoon: Corner office Sutton Impact: Dogs love baseball Dream job x2: Exec moonlights on the air Cartoon: Olympic spotlight Ecological lessons from Rio
SBJ/November 5-11, 2012/Opinion
Reporting on NFL labor agreement misleading
Published November 5, 2012, Page 24
How could SportsBusiness Journal be so wrong? The answer is that NFL teams have been able to use various CBA provisions to spend very large amounts of cash on players above the cap, and have even greater flexibility to do so under the new rules in the 2011 CBA. As a result, even though the new CBA sets the salary cap plus benefits at between 47 percent and 48.5 percent of “All Revenue,” teams can and do spend much more than that on players so that there were no “steep financial concessions.”
Team cash spending on players increased substantially in 2011, with players being paid about $160 million per team in cash plus benefits. This was well above the $142.4 million in salary cap dollars plus benefits for 2011, i.e., a lot of cash over cap. The players’ cash share of AR in 2011 of about 55 percent was actually higher than the players’ cash share in any year under the prior CBA.
In short, contrary to the SportsBusiness Journal article, so far the new CBA has delivered a higher, not lower, percentage of revenues to NFL players. An easy fact check by an editor or a simple web search could have avoided such an egregious error in reporting.
NFL Players Association