TLA acquires Australian agency Union to look at Gilbert’s strategy NFLPA challengers fall, ideas may last Labor & Agents: Inside MLS CBA Is ATP prize mandate working? Relativity Sports tops in player reps In NFLPA race, drama different from 2009 How MLS labor deal came together Labor & Agents: Kain leaves CAA Sports NFLPA makes new push on collusion claim
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBJ/August 15-21, 2011/Labor and Agents
Exceptions for big-ticket projects shave NFL players' annual share
Published August 15, 2011, Page 1
The new CBA, finalized on Aug. 4, also makes it more difficult for the NFL Players Association to challenge the league’s business judgment, something the union did successfully earlier this year when a judge ruled the NFL violated the old labor deal by requiring broadcasters to pay their fees even in a lockout.
The Dallas Cowboys’ merchandise company is one item in the agreement that thins the money pool from which players get their cut.
But starting with the average of 47 percent of revenue, the league gets a credit of up to 1.5 percent for stadium expenses, which reduces the overall percentage take of the players. The pool of money the players get their cut from is also thinned for a range of items, including NFL Ventures business, the Dallas Cowboys’ merchandise company, the New York Jets’ and Giants’ personal seat license sales, and potentially a new stadium in Los Angeles (see chart).
“Each one is expected to have a return for the players many times over,” said Marc Ganis, a sports consultant with close ties to the NFL.
League officials declined to comment. The NFLPA did not respond for comment.
While it’s unclear exactly how much each of these measures will reduce the actual percentage share the players will get, league sources insist this is not a case of a fast one being pulled on the NFLPA because the idea is for these deductions and credits to fuel revenue growth.
“The stadium credits are a 1.5 [percent] … deduction from the … [47 percent] player share,” one league source said. “The other items are indeed off the top, excluded from AR (all revenue), making the pot from which the player share is computed smaller.”
Part of the league’s concern with the old deal was it did not create incentives for the NFL to invest. If, for example, a new venture in its first year generated $10 million of revenue, that revenue had to be shared with the players irrespective of the costs. Now, the league can identify three NFL Ventures projects annually as being eligible for deductions. NFL Ventures pertains to NFL Network and licensing and merchandise business.
In 2012, according to the CBA, up to $60 million of deductions for the three selected projects can be taken from annual revenue shared with the players. A league source said the way this will work is the NFLPA would sign off on projects only if convinced the projects can be profitable for both sides.
No specific amounts are provided for after 2012.
Similarly, the league can propose further stadium credits beyond the 1.5 percent already factored in, this source said. However, the league will have to prove to the NFLPA that these extra credits will bring well north of a 100 percent return for the players.
The CBA also has a provision that the league can exclude investments in a new Los Angeles stadium from the stadium credit limit, though the NFLPA has to sign off on this extra allocation, too. A separate provision in the CBA allows the league, with union approval, to divert national TV revenue for stadium projects — a move that, a source said, would aid a new L.A. stadium.
Meanwhile, the league won language in the CBA that would likely prevent a repeat of the lockout insurance case that played out this year. A federal judge ruled March 1 that the league had violated the CBA by requiring broadcasters to pay their fees even in a lockout, rejecting arguments that the NFL had used its best business judgment.
“It made it a risk for every business decision a club might make,” a source said. The case was dropped as part of the new CBA agreement.
In his decision, the judge rejected the NFL’s argument that it had met the legal test of using “sound business judgment” in crafting the TV contracts with the lockout language. The new CBA inserts the replacement term “reasonable business judgment,” appearing to lower the threshold.
Now the CBA reads, “The parties … shall consider and give substantial weight to the reasonable business judgment of the NFL or the NFL Team but no deference will be applied where the NFL is alleged to have deferred or forgone revenues of $1 billion or more for the purpose of securing leverage in collective bargaining, in which case any finding of non-compliance shall require proof by a clear preponderance of the evidence.”
In the media fees case, the NFLPA alleged the league gave up about $700 million in TV money to win the guarantee of payments during a lockout. Under the new provision, that would not have been enough to send it to a system arbitrator.
The new CBA also eliminates the so-called “sham” language. The old contract said that if the union decertified after the expiration of the deal, the league could not declare it a sham, and then the players would have to wait six months to file an antitrust lawsuit. In the new deal, each side reserves its own legal rights.