FIFA's Valcke Backs Match Hospitality Football Notes Transfers Fueled By Offshore Lending Doyen: Investor Ban Hurts Small Teams Football Notes Rio Freeway To Displace 800 Families Blatter: FIFA Will Ban Third-Party Ownership Blatter Downplays Calls For Garcia Report Champagne Wants Report Made Public May '11 La Liga Match Under Microscope
Enter amount in full numerical value, without currency symbol or commas (ex: 3000000).
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD Global/June 26, 2014/World Cup
Uruguay's Suárez Facing Substantial FIFA Ban After Allegedly Biting Italy's Chiellini
Published June 26, 2014
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
ON THE DEFENSIVE: FOOTBALL ITALIA reported the Uruguayan FA is "preparing an interesting approach" to its defense. Its lawyers will maintain the images of bite marks were "photoshopped" to make the incident look more serious than it was (FOOTBALL ITALIA, 6/25). REUTERS' Malena Castaldi reported Suárez's lawyer believes that "there is a European campaign against the controversial striker." Uruguay FA board member Alejandro Balbi, who is also Suárez's lawyer, said, "We don't have any doubts that this has happened because it's Suárez and secondly because Italy was eliminated" (REUTERS, 6/25).
FOOTBALL WORLD REACTS: In London, Jack de Menezes wrote former ManU player Paul Scholes said that handing Suárez a 10-match ban or suspending him from the remainder of the World Cup "would not be sufficient punishment." Scholes "blasted the striker," and feels that a lengthy ban -- longer than the 10 matches he received for biting Chelsea's Branislav Ivanovic -- "is the only way that the punishment can fit the crime." Another "controversial character" in Queens Park Rangers player Joey Barton expressed his view on what the alleged bite from Suárez was down to, which in his eyes "comes with the territory" of being a "winner." However, former Liverpool player Robbie Fowler believes that "the latest incident could signal the end" of Suárez’s career at Anfield. Fowler admitted that Suárez has left himself indefensible, and that what he did on Tuesday had left the ex-Reds striker "flummoxed" with the difference in his behavior on and off the pitch. With both Real Madrid and Barcelona linked with big-money moves for Suárez, "it remains to be seen whether the Merseyside club are now willing to part with a player who they fought tooth and nail to keep hold of last season, or whether his latest indiscretion has put off the Spanish club’s from pursuing their top transfer target" (INDEPENDENT, 6/25). In London, Mark Ogden wrote "armed soldiers patrolled Uruguay's team hotel in Natal" in the wake of the latest controversy surrounding Suárez. Individual guards "lined the outside of the hotel, with two truck loads of troops also parked outside the team base" (TELEGRAPH, 6/25).
AROUND THE GLOBE: The story received mixed coverage in newspapers globally. The Liverpool Echo splashed the Suárez story across its front page under the headline "He Needs Help." In Italy, most papers played up Italy's defeat in the game instead of the biting incident. In Uruguay, El Pais' front page featured a picture of jubilant Uruguay fans celebrating the club's victory in the street, with no mention of Suárez (SBD Global).