Bremen, Leverkusen Schedule Tours Antigua, Barbuda Sancioned By FIFA Anelka, FA Set To Accept Five-Game Ban Arsenal CEO: Players Losing Out In Fees Gunmen Fire On Club President's Home Government To Seize Liga MX Queretaro World Cup Marks 100-Day Countdown CONCACAF Launches Pro League Task Force Football Notes DFB Boss Defends Michel Platini's Plans
Enter amount in full numerical value, without currency symbol or commas (ex: 3000000).
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD Global/July 2, 2013/International Football
Sepp Blatter Pledges That FIFA Will Give $100M Back To Brazil For Hosting World Cup
Published July 2, 2013
ROUSSEFF APPROVAL LOW: In London, Joe Leahy reported Brazil's 3-0 victory over Spain in the Confederations Cup final Sunday was a "rare piece of good news" for President Dilma Rousseff, whose approval ratings "have fallen 27 percentage points since early June when Brazil’s nationwide political protests started." The sudden swing in the opinion polls "represents the end of a long honeymoon" for Rousseff as slowing economic growth, rising prices, perceived corruption and poor public services "have led to a once quiescent electorate becoming more restive." Rousseff and the Confederations Cup "were not the original targets of the demonstrators," but they were "quickly included after she was booed at the opening match in Brasília and protesters began decrying the cost of holding the World Cup" (FINANCIAL TIMES, 7/1).
NO LEGACY FOR HOSTS: INSIDE WORLD FOOTBALL's Andrew Warshaw reported FIFA Secretary General Jerome Valcke has accused UEFA of "opportunism and irresponsibility" after Europe's governing body denounced FIFA for "asking World Cup hosts to fork out a fortune on infrastructure to the detriment of more important social needs." Valcke: "It's irresponsible to make such declarations and to use the demonstrations in Brazil to justify a decision to organize a competition like the Euro 2020 in more than one country." A senior UEFA official, saying he was speaking for the confederation, said the mass demonstrations that have been sweeping through Brazil proved that single-nation hosting was too great a burden on the population and that it was "absurd in this day and age to ask for huge capital investment for a tournament that lasts three weeks and leaves no legacy" (INSIDE WORLD FOOTBALL, 7/1).