Fundraiser Aims To Revive Leeds United AFE President Critical Of LFP Head Tebas Sons Of Struth Chief Hits Out At Ashley Perth Glory Breach A-League Salary Cap Bulgarian Clubs Meet Deadline Bolton Says Debt Figure Up To $256M FIFPro, UEFA Look To Outlaw TPO Hearts Signs Deal With Save The Children UTV Media Critical Of BBC Radio 5 Live Tottenham, Archway Reach Agreement
Enter amount in full numerical value, without currency symbol or commas (ex: 3000000).
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD Global/March 14, 2013/International Football
Scottish Football's 12-12-18 Reconstruction Plan Threatening To 'Collapse Into Farce'
Published March 14, 2013
COLT QUANDARY: In Glasgow, Gordon Waddell reported Longmuir wants to see colt teams "introduced at the expense of smaller clubs from day one." He feels their inclusion would "future-proof" the Scottish game against the big two departing for a regional or European League, "at least leaving part of their brand alive at home and preserving the commercial benefits they bring." He has given clubs until Friday to respond, but many within the SFL "are baffled by the move and believe their chief executive is putting Rangers’ desires in particular ahead of the wishes of the other 29." Longmuir said: "The Colt team issue has been discussed over many years. The basic premise is that the largest clubs have the ability, and fan base, to create a second team which would compete as an independent entity in the lower leagues" (DAILY RECORD, 3/13).
PUSHING BACK: In Edinburgh, Gavin McCafferty reported Scottish First Division Falkirk Chair Martin Ritchie has "accused Longmuir of acting 'irresponsibly' by proposing Old Firm 'colt' teams join a new league set-up." Ritchie feels that "they should focus on the plans in hand rather than creating fresh controversy." Ritchie said, "The problem I have with it, I think at this stage it’s just a total distraction from the key issue that everybody is discussing, which is reconstruction. It’s going to divide the clubs, and it’s going to divide the supporters and to introduce it at this stage of the reconstruction debate, I think it’s irresponsible (SCOTSMAN, 3/13).