Leicester City Sacks Claudio Ranieri Six Nations Jeopardizing Sponsorship Appeal Hangin' With ... Tom Elsden Groups To Bid For Southampton, Source Says Football Betting Reports Are 'Tip Of The Iceberg' 'This Girl Can' Campaign Promotes Activism Orange Interested In Canal+ Sports Rights Pacquiao, Khan Confirm Fight Negotiations IMG Produces Celtic Football Documentary Africa Wants 10 World Cup Places
SBD Global/December 10, 2012/OlympicsPrint All
Indian sport was "dealt a twin body blow" when the Indian Amateur Boxing Federation was suspended by the int'l body and de-recognized by the sports ministry while the government also withdrew recognition to the Archery Association of India, according to the HINDUSTAN TIMES. The provocation was "election irregularities on both counts," the very same reason the IOC suspended the Indian Olympic Association. The "archery mess was waiting to happen." AAI President Vijay Kumar Malhotra, 81, was re-elected for a 10th term last month -- a "violation of the sports code that restricts the number of terms to three and the age limit to 70" (HINDUSTAN TIMES, 12/7). The PTI reported that the Int'l Boxing Association (AIBA) has provisionally suspended the IABF alleging "possible manipulation" in its recent elections. The AIBA said in a statement: "Further to the International Olympic Committee's suspension imposed on the Indian Olympic Association, the International Boxing Association Executive Committee Bureau has decided today December 6 to provisionally suspend the Indian Amateur Boxing Federation. This provisional suspension is also due to the fact that AIBA had learned about possible manipulation of the recent IABF's election. AIBA will now investigate this election and especially a potential political link between IOA president, as former chairman of the IABF, and the IABF election" (PTI, 12/9).
STEPPING DOWN: The DNA's Norris Pritam wrote the "tremors in the corridors of Delhi’s Shastri Bhawan, where Sports Minister Jitendera Singh made the announcement, rattled the Chautala-Bhanot camp, which had earlier defied the dictate" of the IOC. This came following suspension of the IOA by the IOC and provisional suspension of IABF by its Lausanne, Switzerland-based parent body, the AIBA. Sensing "the matter as grave," Indian National Lok Dal Party member Abhay Singh Chautala "lost no time in bowing to the IOC dictate." He agreed to step down from his post and said that the IABF was "ready to hold a re-election to regain AIBA’s affiliation." Chautala said IABF re-election "was an option if that is what the AIBA insisted on." Chautala: “We are ready for a re-election, and I am ready [to] quit the post of chairman. AIBA can send its observer and fix the date also" (DNA, 12/9).
IN A PICKLE: The ASIAN AGE wrote Indian sport is in "a pretty pickle at the moment." At the heart of the matter is how "elections are handled by these associations, which are usually headed by politicians or bureaucrats who have mastered the art of manipulating a captive vote bank and retaining control over the affairs of sport." India's veteran sports administrators have "established such a hold on the federations that not even the most-idealistic retired sportsman would consider getting involved in administration" (ASIAN AGE, 12/9).
UNCERTAIN FUTURE: In New Delhi, Navneet Singh noted Friday saw "plenty of action but little assurance that Indian athletes, left seething and worried about their future, will not be hurt by the actions of their sports bosses." The new IOA office-bearers face possible legal action by the IOC that has not recognized the Wednesday elections. The IOC has said that it would deal only with Malhotra and outgoing Secretary General Randhir Singh. This means the new office-bearers "may not even be able to carry out day-to-day activities." A letter from IOC Dir General Christophe De Kepper said that the IOC "might take legal action against the IOA if its funds are misused." The letter said, “…they are not entitled to access the suspended IOA’s bank accounts and the funds of the Olympic Movement” (HINDUSTAN TIMES, 12/8). Also in New Delhi, Aabhas Sharma wrote "some say that trouble was inevitable, given the unprofessional manner in which Indian sports bodies and federations are run and their dependence on the government." Now, the issue of sports management in India has "become something of a public scandal" (BUSINESS STANDARD, 12/8).
ATHLETE SPEAKS OUT: The PTI reported veteran Indian tennis player Mahesh Bhupathi feels the IOA suspension is a "culmination of dirty politics." Bhupathi: "I am not sure who is personally responsible for this but from what I hear and read, it's a culmination of dirty politics." Bhupathi said that the developments are "embarrassing." Bhupathi: "...I am not sure when this has happened last to any country, not being able to represent India for the sportsperson at any international meet is punishing and for absolutely no fault of theirs" (PTI, 12/8). The AFP reported the administration of Olympic sports in India could "face a major overhaul." Rifle shooter Abhinav Bindra tweeted, "Indian sports DETOX begins." Politicians and officials, who regarded national sports federations as "their personal fiefdoms, suddenly found themselves cornered -- but typically remained unrepentant" (AFP, 12/9).
CONSIDER THE CONTEXT: In Chennai, Injeti Srinivas opined the present action of the IOC "has to be viewed in the context of previous suspensions of NOCs." Iraq was suspended in '08 for dismissing the NOC and installing a new one headed by its own sports minister. In '10, Kuwait was suspended because its sports law was seen to "heavily interfere with the functioning of the NOC." Ghana, in '11, was suspended because the heads of National Sports Federations were "nominated by the government." In all these cases, the principal cause of action was “government interference” threatening the autonomy of sport guaranteed by the Olympic Charter. In the case of India, however, the position appears to be quite the opposite because the National Sports Code "only seeks transparency and accountability" from the IOA and the NSFs in "promoting the Olympic movement in the country" (THE HINDU, 12/10).
Figures released by Sport England show that Britain’s success at the London Olympics and Paralympics has "produced a surge in grassroots sports participation," according to Simon Hart of the London TELEGRAPH. The agency’s survey revealed that 15.5 million people in England age 16 and over participated in sport at least once a week over the past 12 months -- a 750,000 rise from last year’s figure. The results showed an "especially marked increase in enthusiasm" since London hosted the Olympics over the summer. Cycling "enjoyed the biggest benefit." Compared to last year, 200,000 more people in England are cycling at least once a week, bringing the number of regular cyclists in the country to just less than 2 million (TELEGRAPH, 12/6).
WOMEN CLOSE THE GAP: In London, Owen Gibson reported the funding body that invests £240M ($400M) a year in grassroots sport said that its latest figures showed the "strongest growth in participation numbers had been among women." An increase of half a million in the past year helped to "cut the gap that still exists between male and female participation." Sport England CEO Jennie Price said that the sports that had done best were those that had "planned to capitalise on the Games." Price: "This is a really substantial increase. It's an awful lot given the economic conditions, the weather and the fact a lot of people spent the summer watching the Olympics" (GUARDIAN, 12/6).
Tennis officials are "considering adding third-set tiebreakers" at the next Olympics after some marathon matches in London this year, according to the AP. In addition, Bronze Medal matches "could be eliminated to lighten the loads of players entered in multiple events." Int'l Tennis Federation President Francesco Ricci Bitti said the matches this year were "very balanced and very long and that ruins the scheduling somewhat." If Bronze Medal matches are eliminated, it would "mark a return to handing out two bronzes for each of the semifinal losers." The process already happened at the 1988 Seoul Games (AP, 12/8).
The Int'l Trade Union Confederation "will lobby to boycott" a UAE Olympic Games if the Gulf state does not improve working conditions for migrant workers. The ITUC, which has already called for a boycott of the 2022 Qatar World Cup, said it would be "appalled" if the IOC awarded the UAE rights to host an Olympic Games unless it adopts int'l labor standards for its migrant workers (ARABIAN BUSINESS, 12/9). The int'l translation forum "Sochi 2014: Translating the Games" kicked off in Sochi for the second time. More than 400 participants have registered for the event. Delegates at the forum will discuss emerging professional issues and the specifics of providing language support at the Games (Sochi 2014). ... The European Olympic Committees meeting "unanimously backed the national Olympic committee officials named and shamed in the London 2012 ticket scandal, in the face of an IOC Ethics Commission recommendation to take sanctions against them. The EOC expressed reservations "about the process of entrapment through which evidence was obtained and reservations about the absence of legal representation." EOC Secretary General Raffaele Pagnozzi said in a resolution after the meeting, "The members of the Executive Committee expressed their unanimous support for those implicated in the December 2012 Report of the IOC Ethics Commission" (MALTA INDEPENDENT, 12/9).