Bundesliga Increases Betting Income Etihad Stadium Ready For A-League Basketball ACT Puts Upgrade On Hold NRL To Reveal Financial Support To Clubs NAB Challenge Web Blackout Angers Fans Channel Ten Puts Netball On Free-To-Air Proposals To End Five-Day Test Match League Notes Duddingston Against SGU/SLGA Merger TV Revenue Puts NRL In Strong Position
Enter amount in full numerical value, without currency symbol or commas (ex: 3000000).
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD Global/October 26, 2012/Leagues and Governing Bodies
TV Deal To Lift Cricket Australia Into Billionaire League
Published October 26, 2012
MAKING HISTORY: In Sydney, Peter Lalor wrote that Cricket Australia will have a female sit on its board for the first time after the governing body "received approval for its new governance structure." Businesswoman Jacquie Hey, mining corporation Rio Tinto Australia Managing Dir David Peever and former adidas Australia Managing Dir Kevin Roberts "were elected as independent directors" to the new nine-member board. The governance changes were "passed unanimously, ending a century-long era where a gerrymander of states controlled the game." Six state-appointed board members remain, however all directors will be independent by '15 (THE AUSTRALIAN, 10/26).
HOUSE IN ORDER: In N.Y., Richard Lord wrote that "cricket's governance is changing -- but it's moving in all sorts of different directions." With the Int'l Cricket Council "effectively controlled by its most powerful members," the evolution of the way in which the game is run "continues to be haphazard and frustratingly inconsistent." Cricket Australia took a step in the right direction with the appointment on Sept. 28 of three independent directors. South Africa is at least "giving the appearance of getting their house in order." Cricket South Africa has appointed five independent directors. In both Australia and South Africa, the appointment of independent directors has "copped a certain amount of flak." For fans concerned about the game's growing commercialization, "putting it in the hands of people who appear to know more about money than cricket looks like a move in precisely the wrong direction." What cricket needs "is a blend of both groups" -- people who are "passionate about the game," but also people who have the necessary skills to run "the money-making behemoth that it has become." Like it or not, cricket is "a big business these days," and needs to be run by "people who know how big businesses work" (WALL STREET JOURNAL, 10/24).