Bournemouth Installs New Pitch Newcastle Bidding To Host Showpiece ECB Considering Olympic Stadium Team Scotland Gets New Kit Provider Sports Direct To Beef Up Board Mourinho Reportedly Misled Taxman 2024 Bid Cities Confident In Budgets IOC Urging Tokyo To Set Budget Russia Calls For Help In Doping Probe Sunderland Owner Open To Offers
Enter amount in full numerical value, without currency symbol or commas (ex: 3000000).
SBD Global/July 16, 2012/Olympics
British Home Secretary Told Months Ago Of Failings Of Olympics Security Firm G4S
Published July 16, 2012
DEFENSE MOVE IN APRIL: In London, Hayes, O'Connor & Watson reported the Ministry of Defense "put 4,000 military personnel on standby for Olympic duty in April because it was concerned over a possible shortfall in private guards." And because the move came three months ago it "raises questions over how much of a surprise it was" when G4S said they wouldn't be able to supply sufficient manpower. Ministers will be told today whether they need "even more troops" on top of the 3,500 already called up. Such a move "would increase pressure" on May, over her department’s handling of the crisis. A Whitehall source said: “Unless we can find more efficient ways of using the manpower G4S has estimated it needed, if they cannot find them, I see little option but for us to [put more troops on standby]. No other body of well-led, disciplined and motivated people exists that one can use at very short notice if really necessary” (LONDON TIMES, 7/16)
G4S APOLOGIZES: In London, Blitz, Warrell & Oakley reported that G4S expressed “deep regret” over its failure to supply enough security guards for the Olympics. The private security group admitted responsibility for the additional costs facing Olympics organizers in a lengthy statement. G4S CEO Nick Buckles said, "We are deeply disappointed that we have not been able to fully deliver against our contract. We are working flat out around the clock to resolve the situation." Big investors said that "they planned to meet with G4S management in the coming days" to question execs over the failure. One shareholder said, "We are not demanding resignations, but clearly something has badly gone wrong." G4S warned that it faced estimated losses of £35M-£50M ($55M-$78M) on the botched contract, under which the group was supposed to supply more than 10,000 guards to patrol Olympic sites and search spectators entering venues (FINANCIAL TIMES, 7/13). Also in London, Stephen Wright reported that Buckles was "left red-faced" after he admitted he had "no idea if those who are working could speak English." Buckles said the penalty payment would be "in the range of" £10M-£20M ($15.5M-$31M) as a result of the firm's "failure to meet its commitments" (DAILY MAIL, 7/13).
OFFICIALS NOT WORRIED: In London, Rosa Prince reported that Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt has said it is "completely normal" for a contractor to fail to deliver on a major project. Hunt "refused to criticize the firm," saying it had acted "honourably" by raising with the Government the problems it was experiencing. Labour's deputy leader Harriet Harman called for troops "who have been called up to provide security" at the Games to be given a bonus of at least the £500 ($778) offered to bus drivers working during the Olympics, adding that the money "should be paid for by G4S, and not the public purse" (TELEGRAPH, 7/15). Also in London, Paul Kelso reported that LOCOG Chair Sebastian Coe has "insisted that Olympic security will not be compromised." Coe said, "We have two weeks to get this right and we will get this right." Home Office officials, the G4S and LOCOG's HR department have "spent the weekend working on rotas and venue plans" to try and ensure that venues and athlete preparations camps are fully staffed as athletes arrive in London this week. Coe: "The reality of security is that it is one of those areas that only becomes clear when the rubber hits the road and you begin to lock down venues. That was when we were able to see the gap" (INDEPENDENT, 7/15).
TERROR SUSPECTS ADMITTED: In London, Mark Townsend reported that terror suspects on the Home Office watch list "are entering the U.K. in the run-up to the Olympics without the necessary security checks." One senior border officer said that inexperienced new recruits, deployed to shorten queues after complaints over lengthy waiting times, "are repeatedly missing passengers of interest who should be referred to counterterrorism officers" when they reach passport control. The official said he was personally aware that three terror suspects -- all of whose names are registered on the Home Office suspect index system -- "had been waved through by staff on his shifts since the start of July." Another colleague alleged that five suspects were "missed" in one day earlier this month (GUARDIAN, 7/14).