NFL Reluctant On Long-Term "TNF" Deal Flacco Stars In Humorous Pepsi, Tostitos Ad Raiders Move Into New Training Facility DraftKings Inks Deals With Cowboys, Chiefs, Pats Judge Questions Goodell's Understanding Of CBA Alameda, Raiders Officials A No-Show At Presser Lenovo Launches Fantasy Football-Centric Ads O'Brien's Softer Side Highlighted In "Hard Knocks" Future Of USA Pro Challenge Looks Murky Falcons, Mercedes-Benz Make Deal Official
SBD/June 5, 2014/Events and Attractions
Nifty 50: NFL Drops Roman Numeral For '16 Super Bowl At Levi's Stadium
Published June 5, 2014
POWER IN NUMBERS: The move away from Roman numerals for the game drew plenty of sarcastic responses on both Twitter and sports-talk TV shows, as well as from various columnists. ESPN's Tony Kornheiser said, "There's probably great import and symbolism in this, and it is completely lost on me" ("PTI," ESPN, 6/5). The Buffalo News' Tim Graham wrote, "From now on, I'm going to call it Super Bowl Fiddy." ESPN and SI.com's Andrew Brandt: "NFL drops Roman numerals for Super Bowl 50. No comment as of yet from Roman Gabriel or Mark Roman." Yahoo Sports' Dan Wetzel: "Don't care what NFL says, sticking with Super Bowl L in honor of Caecilius of Pompeii. This anti-Latinism has to stop" (TWITTER.com, 6/4). In L.A., Paul Whitefield writes, “Not pleasing to the eye? It’s an L, not a garbage dump.” Whitefield: “Since when does the NFL, land of the 350-pound linemen, care about looks?” (LATIMES.com, 6/4).
WHEN IN ROME....: ESPN’s Mike Greenberg said, “This is not a good day for the Roman numeral" ("Mike & Mike," ESPN Radio, 6/5). The N.Y. Post's Bart Hubbuch: "The NFL is calling it Super Bowl 50 but insists that we write the final score in Roman numerals." Grantland's Bill Barnwell: "If we made it through Super Bowl XXX we can make it through Super Bowl LIX people come on." Bloomberg View's Kavitha Davidson: "Apparently we can't count past XLIX." Bleacher Report's Ty Schalter: "But 'Super Bowl XLVIII' is perfectly normal?" SI.com's Andy Staples: "It’ll always be Super Bowl L to me" (TWITTER.com, 6/4). CBS Sports’ Allie LaForce said, “I’m excited because I can’t read Roman numerals. I just wish they would stick to numbers after this point” ("Lead Off," CBS Sports Network, 6/4). Fox Business' Cheryl Casone hoped the switch would be permanent "because I can never read those numbers anyway" ("After the Bell," Fox Business, 6/4). SPORTING NEWS' Vinnie Iyer wrote, "It's time they just go with the numbers that everyone uses and by which no one is confused. ... We're not waiting for World Series CX this fall" (SPORTINGNEWS.com, 6/4).
I'M A LOSER, BABY: ESPN's Tony Reali wondered if the move to drop Roman numerals is because the NFL does not "want the letter 'L' for 'loser?'" Reali: "We waited all these years to get to L and now we're just going to get rid of it?" ("PTI," ESPN, 6/4). ESPN's Keith Olbermann said just the "visual reference to Super Bowl L would make people giggle or make people think you spell 'bowl' with two l's" ("Olbermann," ESPN2, 6/4). In L.A., Sam Farmer writes it might be “tough to sell caps branded with a big L on the front” (L.A. TIMES, 6/5). ESPN's Jackie MacMullan said, "I was looking forward to Super Bowl L. You know, like Romo numeral, like never wins" ("Around The Horn," ESPN, 6/5). The St. Paul Pioneer Press' Mike Berardino wrote, "Sorry to hear #NFL is going with 50 instead of Super Bowl L. Was looking forward to Bud Grant, Marv Levy, Dan Reeves as honorary coaches" (TWITTER.com, 6/4).