Steelers Exploring '23 Super Bowl Bid Redskins DC Stadium Could Hinge On Name Change Chargers, Raiders Meet With L.A. Officials Lions Set To Host LGBT Pride Night NFL To Hire Forensics Expert NFL To Celebrate Season Opener In S.F., Boston Could 31-Year-Old Become Face Of Titans? Hyundai Signs Four-Year Deal As NFL Auto Sponsor CAA NFL Agent Tom Condon Profiled Several Venues Considered For Temporary NFL Stay
SBD/February 26, 2014/Sports in Society
Support Growing For NFL To Move Super Bowl If Arizona Passes Right To Refuse Service
Published February 26, 2014
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
LOST IN THE DESERT: ESPN.com's Kevin Seifert wrote, "I can't envision a scenario in which the NFL plays the Super Bowl in Arizona if Brewer allows the bill to become law." The NFL "awarded this game to Arizona long before SB 1062 became an issue." But part of the Super Bowl bid "for any site is to remain in compliance with all NFL rules and policies." Seifert: "The guess here, based on the NFL's statement, is that Arizona would run afoul of that requirement under SB 1062." The logistics of moving a Super Bowl less than a year out "would be a nightmare for NFL employees, but it wouldn't compare to the fallout of playing in a state that provides an authorized platform for discrimination" (ESPN.com, 2/25). A DENVER POST editorial is written under the header, "Use Your Power In Arizona, NFL." If Brewer "does not veto this measure" the NFL "should take its 2015 Super Bowl away" (DENVER POST, 2/26).