Manfred Insists MLB Committed To WBC Big League Weekend May Have To Move In '18 FIFA Encouraging Co-Hosting For '26 World Cup Lions Want To Host Another Super Bowl Columbus Unveils Logo For '18 Women's Final Four Oregon Wins National Sports Forum Case Cup Rogers Place Will Host Inaugural PBR Global Cup Mark Wilf: Vikings Can Put On Spectacular SB Houston Mayor Happy With Super Bowl Week Political SB Ads Generate Minimal Backlash For Brands
SBD/February 3, 2014/Events and Attractions
Mara Eyes Another N.Y./N.J. Super Bowl, As Goodell, Other Owners Sound Positive Note
Published February 3, 2014
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
COLOR ME IMPRESSED: NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said after the game, "Let me first give a great shout-out to New York and New Jersey for a spectacular week here at the Super Bowl, so thank you" (N.Y. POST, 2/3). Chiefs Chair & CEO Clark Hunt said, "When it comes time to vote, owners will remember how well things went this week." Jaguars Owner Shahid Khan said of having a cold-weather Super Bowl, "I think it is really part of football. It’s going to be part of the future of this game" (N.Y. TIMES, 2/3). Steelers Chair Dan Rooney, of more Super Bowls in cold-weather cities, "I think you'll see it. Maybe not tomorrow, but someday" (BLOOMBERG NEWS, 2/3). In DC, Mark Maske writes the mild weather conditions at the game were "good news" for cities "with cold winter weather interested in hosting outdoor Super Bowls in the future." The event was "viewed by some as a test case for such cities." If so, the test’s "outcome was promising." Things "went seamlessly, for the most part, all week" (WASHINGTON POST, 2/3). But ESPN N.Y.'s Dan Graziano wrote Goodell and NFL owners "insisted this would be a one-time exception to the NFL's longstanding rule" against cold-weather Super Bowls, and "no one's calling these guys" on it. Graziano: "They shouldn't press their luck" (ESPNNY.com, 2/2).
HOW N.Y./N.J. PULLED IT OFF: New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority President & CEO Wayne Hasenbalg: "At the end of the day, when everyone assesses how we delivered, I think we lived up to all the representations we made" (Newark STAR-LEDGER, 2/3). In Seattle, Geoff Baker writes the week before the Super Bowl "went off largely without a hitch" (SEATTLE TIMES, 2/3). USA TODAY's Brent Schrotenboer reports despite temperatures around 30 degrees on Friday, crowds "packed the outdoor 'Super Bowl Boulevard' in Times Square" (USA TODAY, 2/3). In Denver, Adrian Dater wrote "the hospitality" around the game was one of the best things about the week (DENVERPOST.com, 2/2). In Newark, Bill Evans writes the game "proved to be a success" for the N.Y./N.J. area and the NFL. The two host states "put on a good show" (Newark STAR-LEDGER, 2/3). Goodell on Friday said of Super Bowl Boulevard, "I think people are feeling the excitement and the energy, and that’s a great thing for us" (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 2/1).
NEW YORK STATE OF MIND: On Long Island, Neil Best writes there was something about the Super Bowl that "seemed to galvanize the area into genuinely caring how it all came off." Most people involved "seemed to come away generally satisfied, and they had every right to be." Best: "Not that all was perfect. Far from it, especially the human gridlock that snarled pedestrian traffic on Super Bowl Boulevard in Manhattan, then hit New Jersey as fans braved hot, crowded platforms for game-day trains." Those were "but two glaring examples of a consistent theme: limited space." Super Bowl Boulevard was "a noble experiment but simply was too crowded for most purposes other than gawking at the Broadway scenery." Still, the NFL "gambled and won, and opened the door for other places with real winters to demand their turn" (NEWSDAY, 2/3). In N.Y., Justin Tasch asked, "Has our region really been swept up in Super Bowl Fever, or are people simply taking in all the sights because it's the next big act in town?" There "isn't a distinct Super Bowl buzz when you walk down the Boulevard." It is "simply normal goings-on for Manhattan." The week leading up to the game "has been a dud." Apart from the "underwhelming" toboggan run, there is "nothing of much interest to do" on Super Bowl Boulevard (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 2/2). ESPN.com's Ashley Fox wrote aside from "one stretch through Times Square, there has been little buzz about the Super Bowl" in N.Y. Fox: "Escape to lower Manhattan, from the meatpacking district to SoHo to the East Village, and there is no feel for the Super Bowl" (ESPN.com, 1/31). But a N.Y. DAILY NEWS editorial called the Super Bowl "an affirmation of New York City’s renaissance." In '90, Time magazine "put the city on its cover, lamenting 'The Rotting of the Big Apple.'" But last week was "a testament to what this city -- always gritty, but not always healthy -- has become" (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 2/2).
ON THE OTHER HAND: In Ft. Worth, Gil Lebreton wrote hosting a Super Bowl in the region generally "has worked," but the media has "rightly complained about the midweek interview logistics." It "wasn’t so much the long ride through the tunnels, but rather the cramped interview quarters" (FT. WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM, 2/2). SPORTS ON EARTH's Will Leitch offered a "pretty safe prediction: This will be the last Super Bowl they ever have in New York/New Jersey." Super Bowl Week "has not been poorly run," and everything is "going fine." But no one in N.Y. "seems to notice the Super Bowl is even happening." In N.Y., the Super Bowl is "just another thing going on." In most host cities the NFL's "monstrous mini-playland" becomes "the centerpiece of all local activity." Leitch: "Here? It's just another reason to stay the hell out of Times Square" (SPORTSONEARTH.com, 1/31).