Chargers Staying In San Diego Next Year Current, Former Fighters Sue UFC Bernie Ecclestone Retains Control Of F1 Comic Book Makes Superhero Merch With QBs Bears' Leadership Under Fire Top ATP Events Could Sue Tour Over Prize Money Broncos Create Sports Management Minor At CSU "MNF" Down On ESPN For Saints-Bears Hallmark's Keepsake Ornaments Include Pro Athletes Mara Thinks NFL Got It Right With Conduct Policy
SBD/January 9, 2014/Leagues and Governing Bodies
Goodell's Support Of Expanded NFL Playoffs Garners Mostly Positive Reaction
Published January 9, 2014
MONEY (THAT'S WHAT I WANT): SPORTS ON EARTH's Colin McGowan wrote because expanding the playoffs will make the league more money, "we can expect it to implement it in the near future" (SPORTSONEARTH.com, 1/8). In Phoenix, Bob Young writes NFL owners "will love it because of the potential for increased revenues, even if they are already experiencing trouble selling all of their tickets for the wild-card round." Goodell pointed out that on the "final week of the season that 13 of the 16 games had playoff implications." But Young writes that scenario "sounds more like an argument for keeping things as they are than one for expansion" (ARIZONA REPUBLIC, 1/9).
NEVER TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING: CBS' Phil Simms noted he would not have been in favor of expanding the playoffs last year, but said, "Now, I would love to see another team added to it.” Simms: “We see there’s not much different between No. 1 and No. 8. We see it every year now, so getting that extra playoff game every year would be great.” He noted adding more playoff games might “keep the NFL -- the money they would get from the extra playoff games -- from wanting to go to an 18-game schedule.” NBC's Cris Collinsworth said he would “add four teams” to make it a 16-team playoff field. Collinsworth: "I would have just a straight playoff, no byes, no nothing. You get one versus eight, you go right down the list.” Simms agreed with Collinsworth and asked, “Do you get tired watching playoff football on these weekends? You can’t wait to watch them because there’s such a finality to it, a long season, so important that we can’t wait to see who wins.” Simms said expanded playoffs would “stabilize two things which I think need to stabilized in the NFL: Head coaches and quarterbacks.” Collinsworth noted the NFL is "going to sell the extra playoff game." Collinsworth: "Cha-ching, they like that part of it. Think of how many games we see on television now in December where there’s about 40,000 people sitting there watching it. All of a sudden now you include 16 teams in the playoffs and really balance up the playoff schedule at that point, now some of those teams even with five or six wins last couple weeks are selling-out because they still have a chance mathematically” (“Inside the NFL,” Showtime, 1/8).
DON'T DILUTE THE FIELD: ESPN’s J.A. Adande said there is a "difference between striving for parody and rewarding mediocrity." Adande: "We don’t need mediocre teams in the playoffs.” ESPN’s Bomani Jones said, “The more you add these mediocre teams to your postseason tournament, the more you wind up, ultimately, randomizing your champion and the integrity of it kind of shakes.” The N.Y. Daily News’ Frank Isola noted of the NFL, "They have the golden goose already. Why are they trying to kill it by adding more games? It’s absurd to play on a Friday and a Monday during the playoffs. The system they have right now is working. Just keep it that way” ("Around The Horn," ESPN 1/8). ESPN's Michael Smith said the playoffs are "supposed to be exclusive" and added, "I don't want average teams in the playoffs" ("Numbers Never Lie," ESPN2, 1/8). ESPN’s Dan Graziano: "I just don’t think adding at the bottom end of anything is a way to improve the quality of your product.” He added, “More often than not I think you're going to end up with teams in there that aren’t quite good enough to be in there" ("NFL Insiders," ESPN, 1/8).