MASN Taking Aim At MLB Advance To Nats Jeter Played No Role In Woods' Tribune Piece Twitter Impact On Sports Reporting Keeps Growing NBC Sports Sees Big F1 Gains Media Notes ESPN Draws Lowest "MNF" Rating Of '14 Finebaum Hosting Call-In Show During Iron Bowl FS North's Ratings Decline For Twins Games Continues App Review: Cavaliers For iPhone Cowboys-Giants Rating Lower On NBC
SBD/October 14, 2013/Media
Buffalo PBS Station Delays "League Of Denial" Airing Until Tomorrow Despite Notoriety
Published October 14, 2013
WHERE'S THE FIRE? In Boston, Ben Volin wrote the film overall was "a bit too alarmist for our tastes, and dead set on pointing all of the blame at the NFL." Many of the problems described in the film were "things that happened to players in the 1970s and ’80s and have been improved today" (BOSTON GLOBE, 10/13). In Toronto, Cathal Kelly writes if the filmmakers' goal was "to rattle the NFL, they failed." Kelly: "Football doesn't feel the need to explain itself because football knows its customers don't care. All of them. Not a single one cares." The film is "pretty damning stuff and pretty riveting television" and "thanks to PBS, it's all over now." The film in the end "will be the coffin lid on the brain trauma controversy" (TORONTO STAR, 10/14). In Illinois, Mike Imrem writes the film "undeniably portrayed" the NFL "in an undeniably negative light." The documentary "didn't necessarily prevent football fans from watching subsequent games on TV or even prevent them from enjoying every time a collision prompted a player to hear Norwegian folk songs inside his battered head." But those who watched the film "have to be concussed ourselves if we weren't a little less comfortable than normal" (Illinois DAILY HERALD, 10/14). In Miami, Linda Robertson wrote, "Denial is the perfect description of the league's mind-set and strategy" (MIAMI HERALD, 10/13).