Ballmer Reportedly Declines Prime Ticket's Extension Men In Blazers Planning To Hold Convention Hornets Announce New Broadcast Team ESPN's Mendoza To Replace Schilling Sunday Players' Tribune Launching Branded Video Series "Ballers" First Season Strong For HBO Media Notes NFL Reluctant On Long-Term "TNF" Deal Fox Execs Impressed With FS1 Progress Schilling Bumped From "Sunday Night Baseball"
SBD/October 14, 2013/Media
Buffalo PBS Station Delays "League Of Denial" Airing Until Tomorrow Despite Notoriety
Published October 14, 2013
WHERE'S THE FIRE? In Boston, Ben Volin wrote the film overall was "a bit too alarmist for our tastes, and dead set on pointing all of the blame at the NFL." Many of the problems described in the film were "things that happened to players in the 1970s and ’80s and have been improved today" (BOSTON GLOBE, 10/13). In Toronto, Cathal Kelly writes if the filmmakers' goal was "to rattle the NFL, they failed." Kelly: "Football doesn't feel the need to explain itself because football knows its customers don't care. All of them. Not a single one cares." The film is "pretty damning stuff and pretty riveting television" and "thanks to PBS, it's all over now." The film in the end "will be the coffin lid on the brain trauma controversy" (TORONTO STAR, 10/14). In Illinois, Mike Imrem writes the film "undeniably portrayed" the NFL "in an undeniably negative light." The documentary "didn't necessarily prevent football fans from watching subsequent games on TV or even prevent them from enjoying every time a collision prompted a player to hear Norwegian folk songs inside his battered head." But those who watched the film "have to be concussed ourselves if we weren't a little less comfortable than normal" (Illinois DAILY HERALD, 10/14). In Miami, Linda Robertson wrote, "Denial is the perfect description of the league's mind-set and strategy" (MIAMI HERALD, 10/13).