Flames To Discuss Project With Gov't Officials Adidas Snags NHL Jersey Rights Deal Blue Jackets Launch "March With Us" Campaign Columnist: NHL Should Suspend Kane Honda Center Scoreboard Debuts Sept. 25 Sabres Rookie Eichel To Endorse Bauer Hockey EA Removes Kane From "NHL 16" Cover Bill Lindsay Out As NHL Panthers Color Commentator Bettman Dismisses Vikings' Stadium For Winter Classic Canadiens Raise Season-Ticket Prices
SBD/October 1, 2013/NHL Season Preview
NHL Appears On Stable Ground As It Kicks Off First Full Season Following Lockout
Published October 1, 2013
ROOM FOR MORE? Bettman downplayed the possibility of expanding to 32 teams, saying there is a "limited amount of space" for teams. Bettman: "If we started expanding tomorrow, people would say, 'We've diluted the product.'" Bettman also addressed whether a "troubled" team could relocate, saying, "We have no troubled teams." He added, "It's interesting because a lot of this speculation and rumor and commentary about troubled franchises was exaggerated. Some of it was wishful thinking by place that wanted (to get a team). ... You don’t move unless you have to" ("The National," CBC, 9/30). But in Vancouver, Ed Willes wrote while the league is "generally dismissive of any talk of new franchises or franchise moves, there does seem to be the distinct whiff of change in the air." Over the past couple of years, there have been "any number of reports identifying interested cities: Quebec, the greater Toronto area, Seattle, Kansas City, even Las Vegas." In fact, Seattle has "emerged as one of the front-runners for a new team." If the league "goes the relocation route, Anaheim is thought to be the franchise which will move." So "where does that leave Canada," specifically Quebec City and Toronto? It is "hard to say, but the problem isn’t a lack of interest." A second Toronto franchise "would instantly become an ATM for the league," as the market would "easily support a second franchise even if it encounters some resistance" from the Maple Leafs and Sabres. The "more intriguing" option is Quebec City. However, an NHL source said that teams in "larger American markets can receive double to triple the amount of corporate sponsorships the Jets receive and five times the local TV contract" (Vancouver PROVINCE, 9/30).
GRASPING FOR THE RING: SI's Sarah Kwak noted the Olympics have "given the NHL an international spotlight for two weeks every four years since 1998," but there is now a "growing list of concerns that imperils a powerful brand extension." Insuring the players "remains a big concern," as the estimated cost for the IOC of insuring players' NHL deals for the '14 Sochi Games will be $8-10M. But the NHL's "biggest grievance is the lost business it suffers by shutting down for a fortnight in the middle of its season." The league has "not committed beyond Sochi and doesn't plan to for a while." That decision will "reveal what's more important: international exposure or increasing revenue" (SI, 9/30 issue). In N.Y., Jeff Klein writes the '14 Sochi Games will "cast a long shadow over the season." If those two weeks "produce anything like the 2010 men's tournament in Vancouver ... it will be worth the wait." The Olympic question "will hang over every NHL game" (N.Y. TIMES, 10/1).