Vikes: Peterson Expected To Play Next Sunday NFL Names Three Domestic Violence Consultants Last Week Might Have Been NFL's Worst Ever NFL Week 2 Sunday Overnight Ratings Traffic Issues Remain For Levi's Stadium Rivera: Deactivating Hardy In Panthers' Best Interests Owners Concerned Goodell Might Resign Bills' Stadium Renovations Well-Received NFL Facing Crisis In Bid To Grow Female Fanbase Bulls Open Downtown Practice Facility
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/May 14, 2013/Facilities
Vikings' Stadium Design Features Glass-Like Roof, Large Pivoting Glass Doors
Published May 14, 2013
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
RAZE THE ROOF: In St. Paul, Ben Goessling notes Trubey “would not discuss whether HKS and Mortensen Construction, the contractor on the stadium, could have added a retractable roof and stayed under" the $975M budget. But Trubey said that in Minnesota's climate, the "perception of being outdoors made more sense than the reality of it, anyway.” Trubey: "It really wasn't the right move for the building. What we've essentially got is a completely clear, open side of the roof, without the struggles of, 'Well, if you open the retractable roof, whatever temperature you have in the building just changes within 10 or 15 minutes to whatever the outdoor temperature is.' As we walked through all the different pieces of the building, this is really what everybody arrived at as the best solution, period." Goessling writes a retractable roof “was, at best, superfluous as HKS and the Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority considered most of those goals.” With a budget “that's considered modest as far as new stadiums go, the parties involved in designing the stadium felt like their solution made more sense for Minnesota's weather and its pocketbook than a retractable roof did” (ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, 5/14). ESPN.com’s Kevin Seifert wrote, "I'll be interested to know how crowd noise reverberates off an ETFE roof, and how loud the stadium will be when the doors are closed versus open” (ESPN.com, 5/13). Kelm-Helgen called the design a "really interesting, beautiful piece of architecture" that will be "iconic." She said, "This facility is going to put us in a position of being able to compete for just unbelievable numbers of national, international events" (ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, 5/14).
RAVE REVIEWS: In Minneapolis, Chip Scoggins writes the new stadium is “bright and open and includes many features that will improve Vikings gameday exponentially.” Sightlines are “better, and wider concourses won’t turn fans into human bumper cars anymore.” Two HD video boards will “enhance the experience," and women will be "able to use the restroom without missing an entire quarter.” Scoggins: “Truthfully, I came to the event expecting to be disappointed that the stadium does not include a retractable roof.” But the Vikings “found a suitable compromise that will bring an outdoor feel and atmosphere to the stadium.” The stadium also should bring the Minneapolis-St. Paul market “into the discussion as potential hosts of a Super Bowl, Final Four and other major events” (Minneapolis STAR TRIBUNE, 5/14). In St. Paul, Bob Sansevere writes the design is “like some futuristic spaceship you would envision warp speeding around a distant quadrant of the universe.” There is a “lot of glass and sharp edges and it will remind absolutely no one of its predecessors” (ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, 5/14). The PIONEER PRESS enlisted local architectural experts to weigh in on the designs. Bentz/Thompson/Rietow President & Principal Owner Ann Voda writes the stadium's interiors "look clean, spacious and contemporary.” Koski Architecture Founder Phillip Koski writes the new design is “bold, angular and sculptural -- totally appropriate for a building of this scale and cultural importance” (ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, 5/14).