Hope Solo's Future With NWSL Club In Doubt Domain Registration Hints At Vegas NHL Team Name Coyotes Keep Collecting Dead Contracts Yard Goats May Get Moved If Ballpark Is Not Ready Mara Defends Giants' Decision To Re-Sign Brown Sabres Introduce Dynamic Ticket Pricing Coyotes Hire NHL's First Full-Time Female Coach Raptors Unveil Two New Jersey Options Wild To Play Iconic Prince Song After Goals Giants Still Getting Scrutiny Over Brown Silence
SBD/May 2, 2013/Franchises
Stern, Silver Defend Committee's Vote To Keep Kings In Sacramento
Published May 2, 2013
TIME TO MOVE ON: In Sacramento, Ailene Voisin writes the city's "arena drama has gone on long enough." With "respect to the disappointed folks in Seattle ... it's time" for Hansen and Ballmer "to turn the page, to find another city and another franchise to pick on." Voisin: "Be wary of taking on incumbents. NBA owners argue like siblings and even have been known to scream at their commissioner." And owners "hate the headaches that come with relocation." Voisin: "Two more words of advice for Hansen and Ballmer: Lose graciously." This is "Sacramento's time, Sacramento's first big break" (SACRAMENTO BEE, 5/2). A SACRAMENTO BEE editorial stated if Kings Owner the Maloof family "truly cares about Sacramento and the Kings, it ought to graciously step aside." It is "time to end the uncertainty and give the team and its city a fresh start." They "have to recognize that their best move now is to sell to a strong ownership group that would keep the team in Sacramento and work with the city to build a new arena downtown." The Maloofs "would still cash in." While the Sacramento group's offer is "said to be" $15M less than Seattle's, it would "still put a record value on the franchise." The Maloofs are "refusing to comment on their next step," which is "one reason why they have worn out their welcome." All the "hard work" by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson will "amount to little ... if the Maloofs insist on hanging on." The "absolute last thing anyone should want is to repeat this wearisome drama again next year" (SACRAMENTO BEE, 5/1).
NEGOTIATING TOOL: MSN MONEY's Jason Notte wrote, "Congratulations, Seattle. You're now to the National Basketball Association what Los Angeles is to the National Football League." With Hansen and Ballmer "still determined to build a new arena in Seattle and planning to pitch the NBA's board of governors before it votes formally on the matter on May 13, the league and its Sacramento franchise now have something just as valuable as a major-market team in Seattle." They have a "bargaining chip." Notte wrote the owners "want to be able to make this kind of move over and over again. 'Give us a new publicly financed stadium, or we'll move to Seattle' is a threat that works as well in Portland or Milwaukee or Minneapolis or Salt Lake City or Memphis or New Orleans or Phoenix as it does in Sacramento." Author Neil deMause said the Sacramento deal maintains "an arena-subsidy business model that has helped make many rich NBA owners even richer." Notte wrote "unless the league expands ... Seattle is just an NBA code word for extortion" (MONEY.MSN.com, 5/1). Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett on Tuesday said that the Kings potentially staying in Sacramento "raises the stakes for Milwaukee leaders hoping to retain" the Bucks. In Milwaukee, Rich Kirchen noted the Kings news has "given rise to speculation that the Seattle ownership group might look to buy another franchise -- possibly" the Bucks. Team execs have said that the team is "not for sale." But the Bucks and the NBA have said that the team "will need to leave Milwaukee after the 2016-2017 season unless a new arena is built." Barrett said, "We need to be pro-active and get the Bucks to stay here" (BIZJOURNALS.com, 4/30).