Brain Bank Finds CTE Increase In Former NFLers NFL Pushes Ahead On Breast Cancer Initiatives New Maple Leaf Square Name Skips Confusion Arizona Fall League To Test Pace-Of-Play Ideas Epix Going Heavy On Digital With NHL Arbitrator To Rule In Ray Rice Appeal NHL Strikes Deal With GoPro Cameras Judge Orders Discovery In Hamburg-ATP Case Sportsnet Reveals New Hockey Central Studio Vinik Plans On Continuing Spending Near Cap
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/March 1, 2013/Leagues and Governing Bodies
NHLPA "50-50" On Approving Realignment Proposal; Players Don't Like Playoff Imbalance
Published March 1, 2013
WHAT'S LACKING: YAHOO SPORTS' Nicholas Cotsonika wrote the NHL's new proposal "did not fix a key problem the NHLPA had with the initial proposal" made in December '11. The league "just changed the look of it." The NHLPA "did not consent largely because the odds of making the playoffs were imbalanced." In an "eight-team conference, 50 percent would make it." In a "seven-team conference, 57 percent would make it." Red Wings D and player rep Niklas Kronwall said, "Everyone should have an equal chance of making the playoffs, and it’s tough when you have (conferences) with eight teams compared to (conferences) with seven teams. Mathematically, to me, that would be unfair." Cotsonika asked, "If the NHLPA would not consent to the initial proposal, why would it consent to this one? Just because it was consulted first, when it wasn’t last time?" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 2/28). But in Toronto, Dan Bilicki wrote the proposal "makes all the sense in the world." It makes "so much sense that you have to figure that a guy like" NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman or NHLPA Exec Dir Donald Fehr would "blow it up out of spite." The real area where the NHL is "screwing this up is one that is probably an oversight to many: The division names." The league needs to "get back to its roots of naming divisions after the great men of the game of ice hockey" (TORONTOSUN.com, 2/27).
NOW IS NOT THE TIME: SI.com's Brian Cazeneuve noted the "most likely cities" to receive an NHL expansion team, "despite some interest from Seattle -- which may have been hurt by the Oilers' new arena deal" -- are all in the East. That may "require an Eastern club or two to shift again if the league expands or moves teams into new markets" (SI.com, 2/27). CBSSPORTS.com's Brian Stubits wrote there is "no perfect solution" to realignment, and that is "precisely why I don't understand why the NHL is doing this now." The overhaul seems "premature and unnecessary," not to mention "tough to do right." The league "doesn't want the Coyotes to move out of Phoenix." Stubits: "Why, as long as the potential for them to be moved to Quebec City or somewhere else exists, would they consider such a massive plan? It seems irresponsible" (CSBSPORTS.com, 2/27).