Chargers, Raiders Meet With L.A. Officials Daytona Int'l Speedway Holding Flag Exchange MLS Expected To Add "Core Player" Roster Spot Lions Set To Host LGBT Pride Night NASCAR Teams Look For Long-Term Value NHL Players Reach Deal With Tenn. Jock Tax NFL To Hire Forensics Expert NFL To Celebrate Season Opener In S.F., Boston Could 31-Year-Old Become Face Of Titans? WNBA Challenged To Draw Wider Audience
SBD/February 26, 2013/Leagues and Governing Bodies
As NFL Combine Ends, Questions Remain Whether It Has Outgrown Its Purpose
Published February 26, 2013
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
SCHEDULE CHANGES: The NFL is contemplating changing the schedule of the combine, free agency and the Draft to allow for one marquee event a month, but ESPN's Chris Mortensen reported, "Don't look for it to happen the way they want it.” Mortensen said moving the start of free agency to April would be so the NFL can "layer this out for public relations reasons, for media relations, to increase revenue.” But the NFLPA is "unhappy because the league year is now starting on March 12 when free agency kicks off." Mortensen: "They’re not going to go for April” (“NFL32,” ESPN, 2/22). YAHOO SPORTS' Jason Cole noted the schedule change "was met with resistance, but also with a mentality that resistance is futile." Former Chiefs GM Scott Pioli said, "Bottom line, among football people like myself, no one is going to like it because we're creatures of routine. If it changes, we'll adjust." ESPN NFL analyst Bill Polian said that the push to an 18-game schedule by the league may "necessitate some change." Cole reported the league additionally may be "angling to create more dedicated programming for the struggling NFL Network by moving events like the combine and draft away from times when ESPN would want to show them." But the idea of having the start of free agency move from March to April and the draft from April to May to have them "so close together creates tremendous stress on teams" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 2/24). ESPN.com's Mike Sando wrote, "I see no downside to the NFL seeking a more evenly paced and structured offseason." The time between the Super Bowl and combine would "expand, but the NFL would promote regional combines in the interim." The league "thinks a more structured offseason would allow for greater promotion of each event and greater profits." NFL players would have to "sign off on the changes." Moving back the start of free agency could "affect the window for players to maximize their value" (ESPN.com, 2/22).
LATEST PUSH TO 18 GAMES? ESPN's Tony Kornheiser noted the "speculation" around all the potential changes is that by "moving everything two weeks, you pave the way for two more regular-season games.” ESPN’s Michael Wilbon said an 18-game season “is on the table” and noted it is "just completely hypocritical as they talk about player safety and try to add more games, more pounding, more hits and I’m presuming more carnage." Wilbon: "We know what the NFL’s agenda is. They want more money. ... They want world domination. They’re not happy with national domination." Kornheiser noted the NFL ultimately "would love to have" an 18-game schedule, but the league “can’t sell it to the players now if you offer the players the same amount of money they’re getting now and ask them to be exposed to two more games of hitting” (“PTI,” ESPN, 2/22). CBS Sports Network’s Allie La Force added, “It’s so funny that in the same year that player safety has been such an issue that we’re going to add some more games” ("Lead Off," CBS Sports Network, 2/22).