First Meeting Of Autonomous Voting Members Set ACC Schools Try New Strategies To Fill Seats Williams To Head UM's Athletic Fundraising CFP Committee Stands By Pat Haden Rutgers Removing Rice From In-Game Video Cincinnati's AD Eyes Good Attendance At PBS Haden Roundly Criticized For Sideline Incident Florida Making Efforts To Be More Fan Friendly NCAA Files Motion In Response To O'Bannon Ruling NCAA Faces Suit Challenging Scholarship Limits
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/January 17, 2013/Colleges
Notre Dame Hoax Puts Spotlight On University, Media For Not Confirming Facts
Published January 17, 2013
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
GETTING THE FACTS: Notre Dame “hired a private firm to investigate after Te’o shared the details on Dec. 26.” Swarbrick said that after the report “came out Jan. 4, he shared it with Te’o’s parents in South Florida on Jan. 5, and the family had planned to release the story next week.” He said that there was “no evidence of criminal conduct or NCAA violations” (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 1/17). In K.C., Blair Kerkhoff in a front-page piece notes in the “early stages of discovery, Notre Dame feared possible criminal activity and wondered about motive.” Swarbrick said that the university “considered but did not alert the police” (K.C. STAR, 1/17). Notre Dame did not encourage Te'o "to set the record straight before the title game.” Instead, officials “sat silent while reporters prepared stories about Kekua's fake death, fake leukemia and fake Stanford degree.” Swarbrick said, "We encouraged him to try to focus forward and focus on the game" (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 1/17).
JACK IN A BOX: In Chicago, Mark Lazerus notes the Deadspin story “never outright accused Te’o of being in on the hoax,” but it did cite a source "that said he was '80 percent sure that Te’o was "in on it," and that (he and a family friend) perpetrated Lennay Kekua’s death with publicity in mind'” (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 1/17). Swarbrick “emphatically” said that he “did not believe Te'o was complicit in the scheme.” Swarbrick: "Every single thing about this, until that day in the first week of December, was real to Manti" (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 1/17). In St. Louis, Bryan Burwell writes Swarbrick's press conference last night was "uncomfortable" (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 1/17). In Honolulu, Ferd Lewis writes in a front-page piece Swarbrick was “at times emotional” during the press conference (Honolulu STAR-ADVERTISER, 1/17). However, in Chicago, John Kass writes Notre Dame is “complicit in the lie,” and all the spinning last night by Swarbrick “can't change it” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 1/17). In South Bend, Al Lesar writes Te’o’s “professional handlers likely have him going over his version of this fiasco trying to salvage some shred of dignity, while not having his marketability impacted too much” (SOUTH BEND TRIBUNE, 1/17). Te'o is currently being repped by CAA (THE DAILY).
FILLING IN THE BLANKS: Deadspin's Timothy Burke said of breaking the story, “We got an e-mail last week that said, ‘There’s something fishy about Lennay Kekua, Manti Te’o’s alleged girlfriend. You guys should check it out.’ We found different outlets reporting different days that she had died” (“GMA,” ABC, 1/17). Burke said Deadspin today will publish a “full listing of some of the glaring discrepancies and contradictions in the reporting of this story ... that should have been an immediate red flag to anybody paying attention to college football news.” There were “five separate dates” that Kekua “allegedly died in major media services and somebody should have noticed this” (“Today,” NBC, 1/17). In Chicago, St. Claire & Hamilton write in a front-page piece the news “leaves a black mark on sports journalism, as many news outlets -- including the Tribune -- ran stories about Kekua's passing without verifying her death.” The Chicago Tribune also “published 15 articles mentioning her death in the past four months” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 1/17). In DC, Paul Farhi writes the media “took Te’o’s word for it without inquiring further.” ESPN’s Gene Wojciechowski said, “In retrospect, you can see where some of those things weren’t adding up to make sense. It’s easy to say now, but at the time it never enters your mind that somebody was involved in that kind of hoax. We wanted to believe it so much” (WASHINGTON POST, 1/17).