Jarrett Joins NBC's NASCAR Coverage MTS Centre Upgrades In The Works Winter Storm Forces Postponements Fire, CSN Chicago Reach TV Rights Deal Richard Sherman To Endorse T-Mobile Xavier, Nike Reach Five-Year Deal ATP Media CEO Steve Plasto Dies Pro Bowl Gets Lowest Overnight Since '07 Classified Advertisements Ex-Prudential Center Exec Sues Lamoriello
SBD/November 19, 2012/Leagues and Governing BodiesPrint All
NASCAR Chair & CEO Brian France on Saturday during his state of the sport address noted that among the "changes to the 2013 car will be the way a sponsor's logo is more prominently displayed ... and how the driver's name will be prominently displayed across the top of the windshield," according to Joe Menzer of NASCAR.com. France said, "We're trying to do things that will build their star power and at the same time have a little continuity for our fans to follow their favorite driver." Menzer noted France also discussed "how a 'digital cockpit' might be coming to Sprint Cup cars as soon as 2014." In reference to a digital cockpit and drivers having smart phones in cars, France said, "Smart devices and smartphones and other devices can have an effect on manipulating the technology that is now going to be in the cars. We have to be careful with that. And so that's why our policy is that you're simply not going to be allowed to take a device into the car with you" (NASCAR.com, 11/17).
NEW LOOK NASCAR: SPEEDTV.com's Mike Hembree noted the new '13 car is "designed to put more emphasis on manufacturer identity, both to satisfy fans and to give car builders better selling points" (SPEEDTV.com, 11/17). In a Q&A with NASCAR.com's David Caraviello, France said, "We still have the sponsorship part of our business that we are hugely reliant on compared to other major sports leagues. And that hasn't gotten particularly easier with the economy continuing to sputter along, and companies being careful and cautious about making sizable marketing bets. So the teams in the sport continue to feel that. But the other things are starting to come (around) -- television, the new car, things we're doing as an industry to take advantage of social and digital media, and a variety of other things. You can see around the corner, that this sport will be in very good shape down the road." When asked about the sponsorship situation being cyclical, France said, "We've had recessions before, but this has been different. I think each race team would tell you it's been different. And different means harder, longer to come back from. But we're still the only place where your brand can be on the playing field, and it's your team, with a huge fan base" (NASCAR.com, 11/18).
CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS: ESPN.com's David Newton noted NASCAR fined '12 Sprint Cup champion Brad Keselowski $25,000 following the Nov. 11 race at Phoenix Int'l Raceway for carrying his phone in the car, but failed to do so when he tweeted during a red-flag earlier in the year at the Daytona 500. However, France did not believe that NASCAR "was hypocritical in fining Keselowski" last week. France said the rule of drivers not carrying phones in their cars, "didn't change a bit. It evolved. That was the first time at Daytona that we had seen somebody in real time tweeting during a red flag at that point. We love that. We just know now that we have things in the car that could be affected by devices." France: "We immediately loved the idea, loved the attention that brought to the sport. (We) encourage it but have to balance it in the competition end to make sure nobody gains an advantage." (ESPN.com, 11/17).
Negotiations between the NHL and NHLPA "are scheduled to resume" today in N.Y. "amid indications that ownership's solid front may be cracking," according to Jeff Klein of the N.Y. TIMES. On the league side, the talks "are expected to include" Commissioner Gary Bettman and Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly, "as well as some owners," including the Bruins’ Jeremy Jacobs. Expected on the union side are Exec Dir Donald Fehr and Special Counsel Steve Fehr, "as well as some players" (N.Y. TIMES, 11/19). A union spokesperson "declined to say if anything new will be brought to the table" (GLOBE & MAIL, 11/19). In Winnipeg, Gary Lawless spoke one-on-one with Bettman and asked what changed his mind from wanting a two-week break from negotiations to agreeing to meet today. Bettman said, "Don called me on Tuesday to have a conversation. It wasn't a negotiation. It was nothing more than a simple conversation. In the course of that conversation he said he didn't know what to do or how to proceed. I said maybe we should take a little downtime, a couple of weeks, especially since we just had five sessions in six days and nothing was produced. In light of that fact he didn't know how to proceed, I said that as a suggestion. He gave it a long pause and then said, 'I don't think so.' I said OK. So this notion that we proposed a moratorium is nothing more than union rhetoric" (WINNIPEG FREE PRESS, 11/19).
SNIDER ISSUES IMMEDIATE DENIAL: Flyers Chair Ed Snider released a statement late Saturday that refuted a report that he had grown concerned with the league's negotiating strategy, saying, "An article appearing in today's Philadelphia Daily News is absolutely erroneous." Daily News Exec Sports Editor Chuck Bausman in response said, "We stand by our story" (PHILLY.com, 11/19). Bettman yesterday said of the report, "It was a fabrication. Ed Snider is the one who told me about the article when he found out about it and he was terribly upset. He's in Europe and it was his idea to put out a statement. Anyone who doubts the resolve of ownership is either uninformed or (being) intentionally misleading" (WINNIPEG FREE PRESS, 11/19). The N.Y. TIMES' Klein notes, "Long known as a hard-liner, Snider said he remained 'a solid supporter' of Bettman" (N.Y. TIMES, 11/19).
CHANGING TIDES IN OWNERSHIP? Snider's statement was in response to Frank Seravalli's original report that stated behind the scenes, there "seems be a seismic shift going on among the NHL's Board of Governors," the group that Bettman answers to collectively, and Snider "may be the big mover-and-shaker behind it all." Sources on Friday said that Snider, once seen "as a supporter of Bettman's push to rein in the players' share of revenue, has soured on the process after it became apparent that a deal would not be brokered in time for a Dec. 1 puck drop." Snider and the rest of the NHL's owners "were promised a big win by Bettman, with player concessions on revenue division and contracting rights." The best they will "get now is a small win in revenue split -- coupled with a demoralized fan base and all-important corporate sponsors that are ready to quit." A source familiar with Snider's thinking characterized it as, "If this is the deal we are going to get, what's the point of dragging this out?" Sources on Friday "indicated Snider's 'strong discontent'" for Jacobs, a "big-market owner who has been one of the lockout's ringleaders." There seems to be "some thinking that the Flyers are interested in teaming up with the midmarket but high-revenue Pittsburgh Penguins to sway more governors toward a swift resolution." The Rangers also are "viewed as anti-lockout." A source said that the Flyers' top-level execs "presented their own proposal for the collective-bargaining agreement nearly 3 weeks ago." It remains "unclear whether their proposal was the engine behind the league's progress last week." The Flyers also have "proposed the use of a high-profile mediator to help smooth things out" (PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS, 11/17).
OWNERS STARTING TO SPLIT? The GLOBE & MAIL's David Shoalts notes more than one NHL governor "pointed out it is almost impossible for the moderates to gain control." While Bettman needs "only eight of 30 votes to turn down a proposal for a collective agreement from the NHLPA, it would take 23 to force him to accept one." The governors said that the "opinions in their ranks are so split neither the hardliners nor the moderates could rally 23 votes" (GLOBE & MAIL, 11/19). ESPN BOSTON's James Murphy wrote there are "increasing whispers that moderates on both sides would much rather come to an agreement than see another NHL season go down the drain." However, the "problem is, these moderates are not at the negotiating table and their opinions don't seem to be driving the talks." It is time for "the voices of reason to step forward now and add some substance" to the bargaining process (ESPNBOSTON.com, 11/17). In N.Y., Larry Brooks wrote the league’s "agenda is being plotted all but exclusively" by Bettman and Jacobs. Flames Owner Murray Edwards was "at one point silenced by Bettman just a moment after Jacobs leaned over and whispered into the commissioner’s ear" (N.Y. POST, 11/18).
STILL SORTING OUT THE ECONOMICS: The GLOBE & MAIL's Shoalts in a separate piece cited one NHL owner as saying that he is "willing to risk cancelling the season rather than sign what he considers a bad collective agreement." The owner added that he is "well aware he is losing fans every day ... but simply cannot agree to a deal he thinks would make it impossible for him to turn a profit" (GLOBE & MAIL, 11/17). In Ottawa, Bruce Garrioch cites sources as saying that Bettman has "been instructed by the owners not to go any further in negotiations with the players." He "doesn't have any wiggle room after putting a 50-50 deal on the table last month." A source said, "(Bettman) is done. Pointless to pretend (he's going to go any further) and give false hope" (OTTAWA SUN, 11/17). In Minneapolis, Michael Russo cites a series of charts that the NHL presented the NHLPA "based off the union's most recent economic proposal." Russo wrote, "If you look at the NHL's numbers, you can see why the league says the NHL and NHLPA aren't as close on a core economic model" as Fehr indicated last Friday night. What all these numbers "prove at the very least is that the longer this lockout goes, the harder the math equation will be to solve" (STARTRIBUNE.com, 11/16). Bettman yesterday said of the gulf between the two sides, "There seems to be a fundamental disagreement on many of the core issues. We have proposed a 50-50 split of HRR which has not been agreed to." He added, "What's in this deal for the players? Give or take $14 billion over the next seven years" (WINNIPEG FREE PRESS, 11/19).
UNION STANDS BEHIND FEHR: CSNNE.com's Joe Haggerty wrote those "demonizing Fehr as some kind of NHLPA pied piper with a bunch of unwitting followers is pretty far from reality." Bruins LW Shawn Thornton said, "I've heard (Fehr) say to people 'that's not good enough, we have to move these numbers if we want to get a deal done.' At the end of the day (Fehr) wants to get a deal done" (CSNNE.com, 11/16). In Newark, Charles Curtis noted the players "seem pleased with the job being done" by Fehr. Rangers RW Marion Gaborik on Friday said, "Our union is much stronger. We have a great leader, we believe in him and believe the deal is going to be done and that it's a fair deal" (NJ.com, 11/17). In Toronto, Steve Simmons wrote, "If I'm an NHL player about to lose my fourth cheque -- that's four of 13 they get -- my question for Donald Fehr remains the same: What is Plan B?" (TORONTO SUN, 11/18). The N.Y. POST's Brooks reported the option of "decertifying as a union was presented to the players in at least a quasi-formal fashion for the first time on Wednesday during a conference call that was open to the full membership of the NHLPA." Don and Steve Fehr "outlined three options for the players in the face of the NHL’s ongoing militancy as follows, and in no particular order: 1) Decertification; 2) Capitulation; 3) Continued negotiations in an attempt to end the owners’ lockout." Sources said that few players "expressed interest in opening Doors 1 or 2." Rather, an "overwhelming number of players on the call directed union leadership to continue on the path through Door No. 3" (N.Y. POST, 11/18).
POWER STRUGGLES: The GLOBE & MAIL's Eric Duhatschek wrote when the office of the NHLPA president "disappeared in the restructuring, the dynamic of the negotiations also changed." Fehr hired his brother Steve "as his No. 2 and suddenly, there are no opportunities for any back channel talks." It is a "development that is frustrating the league to no end, one of the many changes the NHL didn't give enough weight to when the process started back in July, when it fired its first CBA volley." The players have "decided just to trust Fehr for guidance on when they might make their best possible deal, without sacrificing a full season." Duhatschek: "When will that moment come? Will it ever come?" (GLOBE & MAIL, 11/17). The PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS' Seravalli in a separate piece writes Fehr and Bettman "are so used to winning that they have never really ever met an equal on such a big stage." They have "kept each other guessing." It is a "perplexing situation to watch them continuously dig deeper into their playbooks." These "headstrong personalities at the top have both sides struggling for progress." Players are "rallying around Bettman's actions and not Fehr's leadership." It is a "full-on power struggle" (PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS, 11/19).
PLAYERS PERPLEXED BY BETTMAN: Jets D Mark Stuart on Friday said, "A break right now sounds ridiculous to me. ... There are probably tactics to everything. I'm sure it's part of some kind of strategy" (WINNIPEG SUN, 11/17). Rangers C Brad Richards on Friday said, "We've been going for a while and then for Gary to come up with a comment about another two weeks off, is mind-boggling, to be honest with you." Rangers RW Ryan Callahan said, "It doesn't make sense to me" (ESPNNY.com, 11/17). Red Wings D Ian White on Friday said, "I gotta be honest: I personally think [Bettman's] an idiot. Since he's come in, I think he's done nothing but damage the game." He added, "There's just absolutely no need to be missing games and doing this kind of damage" (USATODAY.com, 11/17). YAHOO SPORTS' Nicholas Cotsonika reported Bettman suggested the two-week moratorium after the league "heard Fehr had told players in a conference call that the owners' 'date' was Dec. 1." Cotsonika wrote, "Even if Bettman wanted to show the players that the owners have no 'date' -- let alone a date of Dec. 1 -- this came off as a desperate attempt not to look desperate." This was a "transparent attempt to put pressure on the players" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 11/16). Bettman yesterday said, "By the way, I love the players. Nobody should think for a moment that I don't. If I didn't I wouldn't do this job. I couldn't do this job" (WINNIPEG FREE PRESS, 11/19).
COSTLY DO-OVER: GRANTLAND’s Bill Simmons wrote Bettman “should have lost his job years and years ago.” Bettman's “supernatural ability to keep ruining hockey is almost unparalleled.” Simmons: “The case against Bettman in one sentence: The NHL sacrificed an entire season so they could reimagine their entire salary structure … and only seven years later, that ‘reimagining’ went so poorly that they might have to sacrifice a second season because they need a mulligan” (GRANTLAND.com, 11/16).
SCHEDULING NIGHTMARE: In Boston, Fluto Shinzawa noted during the lockout, "a person with one of the most challenging tasks" is NHL Senior VP/Scheduling & Broadcasting Steve Hatze Petros. Each team "regularly updates him with arena schedules, which change during the lockout as events such as concerts, rodeos and speaking engagements fill in dark dates." If a shortened season is "possible, the NHL's priorities are to maintain intraconference play to promote playoff races and give its national broadcast partners (CBC, NBC, TSN, RDS) their preferred games" (BOSTON GLOBE, 11/18). In Columbus, Aaron Portzline noted the NHL is "likely to axe All-Star weekend -- Jan. 26-27 in Nationwide Arena -- when the next cluster of games are canceled." Logistics "aside, there is a growing sense -- in Columbus and around the NHL -- that even if a season could be spared, it would be best for all parties if the game were canceled and promised to the Blue Jackets at a later date, most likely 2015" (DISPATCH.com, 11/18).
ALIENATING THE FANS: In Philadelphia, Sam Carchidi wrote, “I'm not so sure fans are going to flock back if the NHL returns. In fact, if I'm reading this correctly, the owners and players are going to have a lot less revenue to divide because ticket sales are going to drop significantly” (PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 11/18). In New Jersey, Tom Gulitti wrote “irreparable damage is being done” during the lockout. Gulitti: “What sponsor would commit long-term dollars to a business in which management and labor can’t get along well enough to avoid a lengthy work stoppage every time their CBA expires? Some fans may never come back” (Bergen RECORD, 11/17). In Boston, Bob Ryan wrote, “This is the thing about owners, you see. They don’t give a damn. By that, I mean they don’t really give a damn about the players and they certainly don’t give a damn about the fans. Are there occasional conspicuous exceptions? Well, yeah. But not many, not when it comes to any interference with the bottom line.” There is “no seeming end to the owners’ duplicity.” Ryan wrote of Fehr, “Don’t these people know whom they’re dealing with? … The owners clearly have no respect for him whatsoever, and by extension that means they have no respect for the players or the fans” (BOSTON GLOBE, 11/18).
The NFL today was expected to announce that it will “convert to an electronic health record system next season with software provided" by Massachusetts-based eClinicalWorks, according to Deborah Kotz of the BOSTON GLOBE. The NFL under a 10-year contract will pay $7-10M “for a system that would store X-rays, blood test results, physical exam notes, medications -- even video clips documenting a game injury -- in one online server that players and physicians could access from anywhere in the country.” The technology will also “allow researchers to tap into the medical records with names removed to analyze a vast treasure trove of data and learn more about field conditions that raise the likelihood of ankle injuries or the types of concussions that are likely to lead to early dementia.” Each NFL team currently “relies on its own medical records system, with some using paper records and others electronic systems that do not necessarily allow players to have access to their records when they switch teams or see doctors for second opinions.” eClinicalWorks CEO Girish Navani said, “The NFL wanted an electronic health record that was usable across the entire system. This system will allow physicians to send prescriptions electronically to the pharmacy or an order for an X-ray or MRI. It can hold a workout regimen for rehabilitation and will allow trainers to examine X-rays from previous injuries to compare with new ones.” Kotz reports NFL players will have “access to a system that alerts their team physician when they are due for a vaccination or cholesterol screening and will keep track of how many players are complying with their health screening.” The system will include “firewalls in place to prevent team trainers and others from accessing health information that players may not want to reveal to all medical staff, like treatment for depression or a sexually transmitted disease” (BOSTON GLOBE, 11/19).
DISABILITY PAYOUT: ESPN's "Outside the Lines" and PBS' "Frontline" in a joint investigation found that the NFL's retirement board "awarded disability payments to at least three former players after concluding that football caused their crippling brain injuries -- even as the league's top medical experts for years consistently denied any link between the sport and long-term brain damage." Documents obtained in the investigation show that he board paid at least $2M in disability benefits to the players in the late '90s and '00s (ESPN.com, 11/16). NFL Senior VP/PR Greg Aiello said the ESPN report “underscores that we have had a system in place with the union for many years to address player injury claims on a case-by-case basis.” Aiello added the disability plan was “collectively bargained with the players.” Aiello: “All decisions concerning player injury claims are made by the disability plan’s board, not by the NFL or by the Players Association” (N.Y. TIMES, 11/17).
NO SMOKING GUN: PRO FOOTBALL TALK's Mike Florio noted ESPN's “supposed bombshell in the concussion cases against the NFL, while not erroneous in its factual content, makes an illogical leap in interpretation.” Specifically, cases from the NFL’s disability board in which "benefits were paid to former players for long-term health consequences are being characterized by ESPN as the ‘smoking gun’ in the concussion litigation brought by former players.” Florio: “Apart from the fact that the information has been well known for years and the NFL’s disability board is independent from the league, the fact that the board consists of representatives from both the NFL and the NFLPA underscores the fact that the players’ union (i.e., the players themselves) had an integral role in the development of knowledge and/or the alleged concealment of it from players.” Florio wrote it has been a “rough year" for "OTL.” Florio: “From the Bernie Fine fiasco or the Mickey Loomis wiretap witch hunt, Bristol’s investigative unit has been doing plenty of swinging -- and plenty of missing” (PROFOOTBALLTALK.com, 11/17). In Boston, Greg Bedard wrote "something seems amiss" on the ESPN story. Bedard: “If the NFL gave the players a check, then they have something. But the board is independent of the league and includes player representatives. So if you’re saying the NFL was covering something up, then the NFLPA wasn’t exactly in the dark” (BOSTON GLOBE, 11/18).
TAKING EVERY PRECAUTION? The GLOBE's Bedard wrote the NFL has “come a very long way in a very short period of time.” Bedard: “Whether they led or were dragged kicking and screaming will be addressed with the many concussion lawsuits.” The “next leap is going to come in a couple of years” when new equipment is “ready to be used.” Concussions at that point “will be much easier to diagnose and in a more timely matter.” But what happened last weekend has “led to questions about whether the league is doing everything it can right now.” Bedard: “The NFL does have the ability to put an independent neurologist on each sideline -- something the Players Association has asked for -- yet it has not done so. Why?” (BOSTON GLOBE, 11/18). But CBS’ Dr. Neal ElAttrache said the on-field diagnosis and management of concussions is “still best done between the player and the doctor that knows him best, and that’s the team physician.” ElAttrache: “Doing that says one of two things if you put these guys on the sidelines. It either says that the experienced team physicians are not competent to make the diagnosis and to manage it on the field or that they’re conflicted and wouldn’t do it properly. I can tell you that neither one of these things is the case. I really think that this is still a diagnosis best made between the player on the field and the doctor that knows him best” (“The NFL Today,” CBS, 11/18).
FORMER PLAYERS NEED HELP: NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell spoke at the Harvard School of Public Health last week, and the AP’s Tim Dahlberg wrote Goodell’s “timing seemed odd,” with his speech “coming after a week in which three starting NFL quarterbacks were knocked out of games with concussions.” Dahlberg: “No matter, because the NFL commissioner is nothing if not a spin doctor extraordinaire.” However, Goodell’s speech “left unsaid” what to do “with the players of the past.” In addition to changing the current game, there is “something else the NFL can change.” Dahlberg: “Doing something to improve the lives of the guys who helped get the league where it is today would be a good place to start” (AP, 11/17).