Beijing To Host '22 Winter Games Sponsors Eye Olympics' Return To China Boston Donors Opine On Where Bid Was Lost Boston Mayor Calls Out Thomas Bach IOC President Blames Boston For Failed Bid Sources: USOC Makes Contact With L.A. Boston's '24 Olympics Bid Folds L.A. Seen As Top Replacement For Boston USOC Feeling Heat For Failed Boston Bid Should USOC Keep Bidding For '24 Games?
SBD/July 12, 2012/Olympics
LOCOG Officials Seek To Have London Games Occur With No Security Concerns
Published July 12, 2012
LAST-MINUTE DECISION: The U.K. government has warned that G4S will “face financial penalties after the military was forced to provide up to 3,500 troops following the private security firm's failure to deliver the promised number of staff for the London Olympic Games,” according to the GUARDIAN’s Hopkins, Gibson & Mulholland. Government officials were “forced into the last-ditch move only a fortnight before the Games are due to begin because they were concerned G4S could not guarantee it would be able to supply the 13,700 guards it was contracted to deliver” (GUARDIAN, 7/12). In London, Rosa Prince notes, “3,500 soldiers have been told to prepare to perform often menial tasks at the Games, including many who have returned only recently from tours of Afghanistan.” U.K. Home Office Minister for Security James Brokenshire said that some of the US$826M contract awarded to G4S “was intended to cover wages for security guards, and as a result, this money would be withheld.” But he did not say "how much would be held back” (London TELEGRAPH, 7/12). Also in London, Booth, Coghlan & Ford note as recently as Monday, U.K. Home Secretary Theresa May “was still defending G4S,” but government officials now have “lost patience with the efforts of the security contractor G4S to recruit and train enough private sector guards.” May’s “change of heart follows a meeting yesterday with representatives of G4S” (LONDON TIMES, 7/12).
TRAFFIC REPORT: The WALL STREET JOURNAL’s Alice Speri wrote, “Complaints about transportation are in full swing.” Network Rail, which operates Britain's trains, staged “a pre-Olympic rehearsal of how it plans to alleviate overcrowding at some London stations during the Games.” But while rail officials “pronounced themselves happy with the drill,” in some locations it “caused confusion, frustration and an onslaught of bad reviews on social media.” Reviews have “been mixed on London's recent handling of big events.” Transport officials “acknowledge the challenge ahead but say the city ... is ready to handle the 855,000 to one million daily visitors expected to descend.” Meanwhile, visitors to Heathrow Airport have “recently reported long waits at understaffed passport control desks” (WALL STREET JOURNAL, 7/11).
OLYMPIC-GEDDON? The FINANCIAL TIMES’ Odell & Warrell note U.K. government officials on Tuesday “were scrambling to avert concerns that London was heading for ‘Olympic-geddon’ amid growing fears that the capital’s transport infrastructure will buckle under the strain of hosting the games.” Concern that the Home Office “is not doing enough to ease immigration queues at Heathrow was compounded by the continued closure of a motorway artery between the airport and the city and fresh reminders of how the creaking public transport system might struggle to cope with the influx of visitors.” There is “mounting concern in government circles and among games organisers that the queues will harm London’s reputation” (FINANCIAL TIMES, 7/12).