Vikings Play First Game In New Stadium Dolphins Partner With Uber On Multiyear Deal Bucs Unveil Renovations To Raymond James Adelson Willing To Spend $650M On Vegas Stadium Poll Shows Chargers' Initiative Gaining Supporters T'Wolves, Lynx Display New Target Center Scoreboard The Star Debuts With Four HS Football Games UAB Building Football Facility Without Walls Raiders Zero In On Preferred Las Vegas Site Chargers' Stadium Approval Nearly "Impossible"
SBD/June 4, 2012/Facilities
CVC Rejects Rams' Dome Proposal, Intends To Negotiate Before Arbitration
Published June 4, 2012
THE SOONER THE BETTER: In St. Louis, Bryan Burwell wrote, "Barring some sort of minor miracle happening over the course of the next two weeks where some anonymous sugar daddy emerges with a winning lottery ticket to foot the entire bill for the rehab of the Dome or the mortgage on a new stadium with all the 'top-tier' bells and whistles, the natural give-and-take, high-ball and low-ball conversations have all sent these talks towards their inevitable destination: a carefully scripted stalemate that should push them toward a lengthy binding arbitration process." The environment of the arbitration process is "where we'll discover everyone's true intentions and point us toward the ultimate end game, which is either a new or improved home for the Rams or this city's loss of yet another NFL franchise” (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 6/3).
TIMING IS EVERYTHING: The POST-DISPATCH's Bill McClellan wrote, "The way these cases muddle along in the system," the age discrimination lawsuit filed by former Rams equipment manager Todd Hewitt “might come to court just as the Rams get ready to leave town.” McClellan: “Better yet, right after they have left town. The jury would probably be ready to stick it to the Rams.” However, if the Rams work out their lease by the time the case makes it to court, "that would not be so good for Hewitt” (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 6/3).