Sherman Critical Of Several NFL Policies Burbank Airport Partners With Rose Bowl Up-And-Coming Drivers Lack Sponsorship Source: Sony To Pull FIFA Sponsorship USOC Extends Nike Deal Through '20 Bud Sticking With Clydesdales For Super Bowl Fanatics Preps For Busy Holiday Season Fantex Selling Alshon Jeffery IPO Marketplace Roundup Patriots' Nike Shoe Goes On Sale Monday
SBD/April 30, 2012/Marketing and Sponsorship
Published April 30, 2012
EXPENSIVE COMPETITION: Reebok President Uli Becker acknowledged that Nike "made continuing his company's deal with the NFL too expensive.” Becker “pointed to other professional and college sports still connected with Reebok or associated Adidas names.” However, he said that his company “recognized several years ago that a big part of its future would be in the personal fitness niche, where it began in the early 1980s, as more and more adults worldwide seek to improve their health.” Becker: “We want to create a reason why Reebok will be there and it has a lot to do with the fitness lifestyle.” He acknowledged that company finances and operations “were rough following Adidas’ 2005 acquisition of Reebok.” Becker: “Obviously in a recession the weakest are affected the most. But we’ve been growing ever since. We’ve replaced a lot of our business with really growing business, and the last two years we’ve had really good growth” (BOSTON HERALD, 4/29).
FUTURISTIC FOOTBALL: AD WEEK’s Tim Nudd wrote the Nike Football commercial that broke Thursday night during the NFL Draft was “rugged, stylized, eye-catching.” The spot from Portland-based Wieden & Kennedy was directed by Mark Romanek and “visually, it’s expert stuff -- clean and futuristic, set in a space-agey stadium tunnel.” But despite “the fancy visuals, it’s the percussive copy that pushes the spot forward.” The voiceover in the commercial says, “This game is not fast. This game is faster” (ADWEEK.com, 4/27).
IN THE WORKS: Spanish-language sports site Marca.com is reporting La Liga club Real Madrid is “on the verge of signing a new sponsorship deal with Adidas until 2020.” The figure involved in the deal “has not yet been announced by either side, but the new deal will certainly represent an improvement" on the US$46.3M received by the club for the '11-12 season (GOAL.com, 4/28).
CLARIFICATION: In Wednesday’s issue, THE DAILY mischaracterized details of Procter & Gamble’s recent deal for its Tide brand and the NFL. P&G handled all aspects of that deal with the NFL internally. THE DAILY regrets the error (THE DAILY).