SBD/April 16, 2012/Facilities

Print All
  • Maloofs Say Original Arena Plan Was A "Bad Deal," But Kings Will Stay In Sacramento

    Joe Maloof said the agreement for a new arena was the wrong deal at the wrong time

    NBA Kings Owners the Maloofs Friday killed an agreement between the team, the city of Sacramento and the NBA to build a new $391M arena, and Joe Maloof called the plan a "bad deal,” according to Ailene Voisin of the SACRAMENTO BEE. Maloof said, “The main thing was ... the projected revenues were too high. They were at 2005 levels, before the housing bubble burst and the economy went down.” Maloof said his family feels "like criminals, and we didn't do anything wrong." Maloof: "This was just the wrong time and this was the wrong deal. When the time is right, we'll do a deal. ... Nobody wanted to get an arena done more than we did. We've been talking about it for 13 years. Everyone just needs to calm down. We all need to cool off.” Voisin noted the fact that "a lot of people still suspect your plan is to spend next season in Sacramento and then file for relocation in March.” Maloof said, “That's not true, that's not true. I swear that is not going to happen. I don't care what rumors are out there. It's our team. We're not selling, and we're not leaving. Our identity is the Sacramento Kings. That's how we're known.” Maloof acknowledged that NBA Commissioner David Stern “is not happy with us” and that Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson “has a different view, too.” He said, “We disagree. Some of those revenue projections aren’t feasible over 30 years” (SACRAMENTO BEE, 4/15).

    LOSING SUPPORT: In Sacramento, Lillis & Bizjak in a front-page piece reported stunned fans “are contemplating whether to remain loyal to the franchise,” and political leaders “are lashing out at the Maloofs.” Corporate sponsors also “are taking stock of their support for the team.” Kings co-Owner George Maloof on Saturday “reiterated his stance that the deal was ill-conceived for both the team and the city,” and he once again “challenged Mayor Kevin Johnson's assertion that there had been a deal at all, pointing to a series of letters the team sent to the NBA expressing its concerns.” Maloof said that he now “feels undermined by the mayor.” He said, “You can't do a deal with somebody you don't trust. I don't trust him.” Maloof after meetings in N.Y. with Stern and Johnson on Friday suggested that the team and the city “instead look into renovating Power Balance Pavilion,” but he “backed off that idea” Saturday. Lillis & Bizjak noted some local corporate sponsors “who combined to spend $10 million on the Kings this season are assessing whether to continue that support.” With many corporate sponsorships “up for renewal for the 2012-13 season, representatives for some of those companies acknowledge that negative press aimed at the Kings will play a role in deciding future partnerships.” Western Health Advantage Chief Marketing & Brand Officer Rick Heron said, "If the fan support isn't there, that goes a big way toward the value of the partnership.” Jiffy Lube, which “paid for electronic billboards around the city last spring advertising the 'Here We Stay' campaign, is waiting to hear from the Maloofs before making a decision.” Jiffy Lube Marketing Dir for the Sacramento area Matt Graham said, "I'd like to hear how they're going to deal with the negative press and the backlash from the fans" (SACRAMENTO BEE, 4/15).

    HE SAID, SHE SAID: In Sacramento, Kasler, Lillis & Bizjak noted Johnson “met privately with the Maloof brothers for more than two hours” on Friday only to leave the meeting “burdened with a dark conclusion.” Johnson said, “I wish I had better news. (The Maloofs) are now saying they don't want to do the deal, which essentially means they don't want to be in Sacramento." Stern said he was “extremely disappointed both for the Maloofs and the city of Sacramento." He added, “I know we've scheduled them into Power Balance Pavilion for next year. It just wouldn't pay for me to talk about anything beyond that." Johnson “quickly dismissed an idea” floated by George Maloof that the team and the city explore renovating Power Balance Pavilion. Stern said that the “team’s concerns were heard” and suggested that the Maloofs “became uncomfortable about the deal because they were worried about taking on more debt” (SACRAMENTO BEE, 4/14). The SACRAMENTO BEE’s Voisin wrote Stern can “scream and cajole and persuade the other owners to oppose a relocation, which he did.” And he can “entice power AEG into the partnership, which he did.” He can even “offer loans and guarantees and make the most recent proposal more appealing to the Kings co-owners, which he did.” Voisin: “But he can’t force the Maloofs to sell. And they’re not selling” (SACRAMENTO BEE, 4/14).

    Print | Tags: Facilities, Sacramento Kings
  • Chicago Mayor Seeks To Renovate Wrigley Without Putting All Burden On Taxpayers

    Emanuel hopes to ease burden on taxpayers by relaxing Wrigley's landmark status

    Determined to renovate Wrigley Field "without overburdening taxpayers," Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is "pushing a plan to relax the ballpark’s landmark status and allow the Cubs to wring" as much as $150M in advertising and sponsorship revenues out of the stadium and surrounding streets, according to sources cited by Fran Spielman of the CHICAGO SUN-TIMES. Emanuel "privately calls it his 'Fenway' plan." With Emanuel as mayor and former Red Sox GM Theo Epstein as Cubs President of Baseball Operations, City Hall "believes it’s time to replicate the Fenway model at Wrigley." Alderman Tom Tunney, whose ward includes Wrigley Field, said the "wish list" of ways to wring more revenue out of Wrigley was just "part of the negotiating process." He "didn’t rule anything out." Sources said that the "laundry list of ideas being kicked around by the Cubs and City Hall does not currently include more night games" beyond the current 30 but could "at some point to generate even more revenue." Two days before the Cubs’ home opener, Emanuel said that he was "in the 'final stages' of negotiating a Wrigley deal." He also "telegraphed his plan to help the team squeeze more revenue out of Wrigley -- by demanding that the Cubs invest their own money in the stadium instead of pumping" $200M into construction of the triangle building. Sources said that the final deal is still "likely to include a variation of the financing scheme that Emanuel once called a 'non-starter' -- forfeiting" 35 years’ worth of amusement tax growth. But, the city would get a "minimum annual guarantee that would rise every year" (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 4/16).

    Print | Tags: Facilities, Chicago Cubs
  • Facility Notes

    In L.A., Hugo Martin noted “a giant, smoldering gap in the side of Staples Center” is the “latest over-the-top campaign stunt for a new attraction set to open May 25 at Universal Studios Hollywood.” A giant “laminate stuck to the side of the sports venue makes it look as if an 80-foot tall, 20-ton metal alien creature from the movie ‘Transformers’ busted a hole through the building.” The laminate “will remain on Staples Center until Tuesday” and is “meant to bring attention the opening of Transformers: The Ride 3D” (LATIMES.com, 4/15).

    PLANNING AHEAD: In Minneapolis, Sid Hartman notes a deal "has been made in which the Vikings would rent” the Univ. of Minnesota’s TCF Bank Stadium “for $250,000 per game” if construction of a new Vikings stadium requires the team to play at an alternate venue for a year. In addition, the university “would get all income from parking and concessions.” If the Vikings “want to install heating coils under the field to make the field playable in all weather, they would pay for that and any other capital improvements they want to make, including providing additional seating capacity” (Minneapolis STAR TRIBUNE, 4/16).

    FINAL STAGES: In Edmonton, Tanara McLean reported city officials Friday announced that PCL Construction “is the preferred company to manage construction” of the proposed Oilers arena “if the long-suffering project gets the final green light.” PCL “is a local company” and the city is “still working out a detailed contract” with the group. The company “will not officially be chosen until the contract is hammered out.” McLean noted there is “no timeline for when the contract will be finalized” (EDMONTON SUN, 4/14).

    DELAY OF GAME: In Jacksonville, Timothy Gibbons reported the city “has pushed back the due date for proposals from companies that want to manage the city's entertainment facilities.” An addendum to the city's request for proposals “was posted on the Jacksonville procurement website shortly after 5:30 p.m. Friday.” Since the request for proposals was issued, contractors “have been submitting questions about the job, which would involve managing seven city properties, including EverBank Field” (FLORIDA TIMES-UNION, 4/14).

    Print | Tags: Facilities
Video Powered By - Castfire CMS Powered By - Sitecore

Report a Bug