Game Changers: Johnson Reflects On Title IX Game Changers: Nets' Pavlova Hopes For Jersey Ads Game Changers: Mentoring The Next Leaders Game Changers: Colleges Challenged To Shape People Game Changers: Female Execs Talk Domestic Violence '16 Swim Trials To Overlap CWS In Omaha Midwest Viable Option For '18 Big Ten Tourney NHL's Winter Classic To Be Played At Nationals Park Finchem Says Tour Could Return To Denver McIlroy's Pants, Shirt Fetching For $20K
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/April 5, 2012/Events and Attractions
Billy Payne Refuses To Answer Questions About Membership At Augusta National
Published April 5, 2012
HISTORY & TRADITION: In L.A., Michael Hiltzik noted IBM “has a very close relationship with Augusta and the Masters.” It is a “leading sponsor of the tournament telecast and provides the Masters with computing services.” Its logo is “plastered all over the tournament's website.” Activist Martha Burk and others have “already questioned whether IBM will stand silently by and wait for Rometty to ask for or be offered membership, whether it will decide to press the issue with Augusta, and what it will do, if anything, if the situation becomes a public embarrassment.” IBM “hasn't spoken on the issue, and no one even knows whether Rometty wants to be a member.” But Hiltzik wrote “all that is immaterial: Augusta has maintained its indefensible men-only stance long past the point at which it should have joined the modern world” (L.A. TIMES, 4/4). In San Diego, Tim Sullivan wrote Rometty’s promotion at IBM is “forcing an issue Augusta National cannot easily avoid.” Sullivan: “If Billy Payne is as smart as I think he is, he would have been ahead of this curve months ago” (SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, 4/2).
MAKING THE CASE FOR INCLUSION: In New Jersey, Tara Sullivan wrote by extending an invitation to Rometty, Augusta would “make its own tentative step toward gender equity, its own gradual shift away from the decades-old policy that has become too much a part of its public persona, an albatross that has long since crossed the line from legally founded policy for a private institution to mean-spirited pigheadedness from the old boys network” (Bergen RECORD, 4/1). ESPNW’s Jane McManus wrote The Masters “should cut its losses and welcome women like Rometty, before women decide a backwards Augusta National just isn't worth their time, despite the heartrendingly magnificent magnolias” (ESPNW.com, 3/30). In Orlando, George Diaz wrote, “I don't see how bringing in a person with Rometty's credentials is going to do anything but upgrade the brand” (ORLANDO SENTINEL, 4/2). GOLF WORLD MONDAY’s Ron Sirak wrote, “It might not happen this year, but with so many corporations now run by women, it’s inevitable a green jacket will soon be matched with a skirt” (GOLF WORLD MONDAY, 4/2 issue).
TIMING IS EVERYTHING: In GOLF.com's weekly roundtable discussion, SI Group Managing Editor Jim Herre said, “There is going to be a tipping point in this controversy -- there always is. Will it be Rometty? Probably not because to most folks she is just a faceless corporate executive, and one who is probably horrified that this is even an issue. Some day, though, the exclusion of women is going to blow up on ANGC. Bet on it.” GOLF.com’s Cameron Morfit said, “Billy Payne is the most forward-thinking chairman they've had at the National since I've covered the Masters. If a woman is ever going to be invited to join the club, I'd guess it's going to happen under his watch” (GOLF.com, 4/1). In N.Y., Karen Crouse writes it is “not as if the club is incapable of taking swift action when the situation dictates it.” A restroom “can be repaired in a day, but a club founded in 1933 on the bedrock of segregation is obviously not so easily rebuilt -- or even touched” (N.Y. TIMES, 4/5). Krouse notes several players in this year’s field were approached and “asked their opinion of Augusta National’s not yet extending membership” to Rometty. Crouse found that “nobody would talk on the record” (N.Y. TIMES, 4/5).