Tustin Wants To Recoup Angels Ballpark Investment New Maple Leaf Square Name Skips Confusion AEG Seeks Extension On L.A. Stadium Project Patterson: Taxpayers Should Help With New UT Arena Stanford Teams With AT&T, Sporting Innovations Facility Notes Angels End Lease Talks With Anaheim Barclays Center Not Yet Fit For Islanders Games Red Wings Break Ground On Arena Project Colorado State Stadium Falling Short
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/May 11, 2011/Facilities
Vikings, Ramsey County Announce Plan To Build $1B Stadium In Arden Hills
Published May 11, 2011
A LOOK INSIDE THE STADIUM: In St. Paul, Dave Orrick in a front-page piece reports the Ramsey County plan calls for a retractable-roof stadium that "affords a view of the skylines of both Minneapolis and St. Paul." In addition to the Vikings HOF, Wilf indicated that "bars and restaurants would likely be sprinkled nearby." But "from the sky, the most visible aspect would clearly be its 21,000 parking spaces." Wilf said that the retractable roof "was 'very important' not just for pleasant fall days but also for his desire to bring a professional soccer team there, as well as high school and amateur sports year-round." Orrick notes those are "attributes of the Metrodome that Dayton has said must be included in a new stadium." The Ramsey County stadium "would take three years to build, during which time the team would continue to play at the Metrodome." The stadium complex would "take up more than 200 acres," and the Vikings "would retain development rights to the remainder, perhaps to build hotels and restaurants." Wilf also said that he "hoped the team could retain lucrative naming rights to the stadium" (ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, 5/11)
DON'T COUNT DOWNTOWN OUT: In St. Paul, Charley Walters notes a deal to build the Ramsey County stadium is "far from complete." Unless approximately $200M "more for highway and road infrastructure improvements is found, don't be surprised if the Vikings soon end up back in Minneapolis seeking a new stadium built on the Metrodome site." The state has said that it is "willing to contribute" $300M for a Ramsey County stadium. But the state "isn't willing to give some $200 million more for highway and road infrastructure improvements." The county "plans to seek the extra $200 million from the Legislature, but lawmakers aren't likely to be forthcoming with the proposal" (ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, 5/11). Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak yesterday "remained confident he could sell his plan that would replace the Metrodome with a roofed stadium and refurbish Target Center." But in Minneapolis, Steve Brandt notes the "reluctant Vikings aren't his only challenge." Rybak also "needs to persuade the Legislature, the Minnesota Timberwolves and at least six more City Council members to endorse the plan" (Minneapolis STAR TRIBUNE, 5/11).
AND THE WINNER IS ... In Minneapolis, Patrick Reusse writes Minneapolis "came up with a haphazard proposal that didn't come close to satisfying the Vikings' desires." The city does not have Hennepin County, home to Target Field, "to bail it out this time." Reusse: "Minneapolis didn't show a pulse as Hennepin County was saving the Twins and providing the city with a spectacular asset in Target Field. And now the city's political followers expected to sit on their dead rears and to be bailed out again -- by some unknown force -- with the Vikings" (STAR TRIBUNE, 5/11). But a STAR TRIBUNE editorial states the Vikings risk "overplaying their hand by continuing to flirt with Ramsey County officials on a stadium site in Arden Hills." The team "thumbed its nose at a smart and less expensive plan for a new fixed-roof stadium on the Metrodome site in downtown Minneapolis that would also benefit the community by renovating and taking Target Center off the property tax rolls." It is "understandable that the Wilfs want to make the best possible business deal for themselves and the team." But this "isn't a case of two private entities at the negotiating table." Taxpayers "would end up owning the majority stake in either stadium, and their elected officials should make the responsible choice" (STAR TRIBUNE, 5/11).