Does Katarina Witt posing for Playboy "mean we've
reached the point where a female athlete can take off her
clothes without having a detrimental effect on other female
athletes?," wonders Carol Slezak of the CHICAGO SUN-TIMES.
Slezak: "Unfortunately, I wouldn't bet on it. If a male
athlete, say Michael Jordan, posed nude in Playgirl, there
would be no negative repercussions for him or for any male
athlete. We wouldn't suddenly take the careers of Brett
Favre, David Wells, Scottie Pippen or Chris Chelios less
seriously as a result of Jordan's decision. ... Why would
Witt's photos even peripherally affect Martina Hingis or
Yolanda Griffith? ... They shouldn't, but they always have.
They help perpetuate the notion that a woman's primary roll
in life is to be ogled by men." Slezak adds, "Female
athletes aren't helping their cause by choosing to pose
nude." If Playboy tries to "woo more female athletes to its
pages," Slezak hopes the athletes "say no" (SUN-TIMES,
11/11). In Hartford, Jeff Jacobs asks, "Are athletes role
models? And if they are, what message is Witt sending?"
Blizzards G Jen Rizzotti: "Women's sports has come so far
and it seems like it's something where some males could say,
'See, this is what women's sports are about.' It could be
degrading. ... I think we're at a point where what one well-
known women athlete does, it kind of affects every other
female athlete" (Jeff Jacobs, HARTFORD COURANT, 11/12).
