Where Will Raiders End Up Playing in '19? Mercedes-Benz Stadium Faces Concerns On Roof Nationals Unveil Luxury Seating Section A's Ready For Final Push On New Ballpark Crews Putting Finishing Touches On SunTrust Park Could Sprint Center Hold An NBA/NHL Tenant? Facility Notes Raiders Begin Process For Vegas Stadium Source: Pegulas Taking Right Stadium Approach Calgary Mayor: Flames' Arena Project "Dead"
CAN MINNESOTA WIN LEGISLATION ON A NEW BALLPARK?
Published September 30, 1997
Pro-stadium group Minnesota Wins said that a new poll it commissioned shows that the stadium issue "could swing some legislative races" in '98 if legislators reject a gambling-linked ballpark finance package and the Twins move, according to Jay Weiner of the Minneapolis STAR TRIBUNE. The 607-person poll conducted by MN-based Decision Resources Ltd. of Minneapolis, found that "up to" 14% of state voters "would punish their legislators for voting against a ballpark package if gambling were the funding sources and the Twins fled." The poll also shows 7% of voters would "reward" legislators for such a vote. Political consultant John Himle said that net swing of 7% "could affect tight races in the" '98 House elections. State Sen. John Hottinger called the poll "highly suspect" since it was paid for by Minnesota Wins "at a cost of about $10,000." Weiner adds the poll "reflects ambivalence among Minnesotans." Asked first if they would support a new stadium, 59% said no. But later, asked if they would support a ballpark if there were no "new taxes and no state general revenues used," 73% said yes (Minneapolis STAR TRIBUNE, 9/30).