Kentucky Adding Ribbon Boards At Rupp Facility Notes Oakland Stadium Efforts "Going Backward" NFL Could Hear Relocation Requests In Late '15 Blue Bell Name Not Coming Off A&M Ballpark Land Transaction For NFL Stadium In Carson Closes Soldier Field Upgrades Include New HD Boards Verizon Insists DC Naming-Rights Deal Isn't Over Study Details Costs For HOF Village Personalized Bricks Near Wrigley Tossed
Upcoming Conferences and Events
CHALLENGE TO JACK MURPHY EXPANSION REJECTED
Published October 17, 1996
The CA Supreme Court yesterday rejected a challenge to the expansion of Jack Murphy Stadium by a 5-2 vote, according to Philip LaVelle of the SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE. Top city officials "hailed" the move as further "judicial endorsement" of government use of lease-revenue bonds, "a popular method of paying for major projects without two-thirds voter approval, a requirement for traditional municipal debt." The decision "opens the door" for the delayed expansion project to begin -- "provided City Hall receives the approval, currently being negotiated, of Padres management." City Manager Jack McGrory said if an expedited construction schedule begins by early January, the project could be completed by September 1, in time for the Chargers' '97 regular season. McGrory said San Diego's '98 Super Bowl plans are still in tact (SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, 10/17).