MLB Giants Payroll To Top $200M For First Time Mitt Romney In Talks With Yankees For Small Stake Redskins Still Silent On Cooley's Comments Sounders Approved To Add Star On Replica Jerseys Montgomery Biscuits Being Sold To Lou DiBella's Group Canucks Owners Interested In CFL B.C. Lions Lakers Adjusting To Life Under Magic Regime 49ers' Paraag Marathe Opens Up About Role Former NFLPA Exec Dir Ed Garvey Passes Away Cubs Using "That's Cub" As '17 Marketing Slogan
IN AFTERMATH OF RAMS MOVE, TALK OF MUSICAL FRANCHISES
Published April 18, 1995
In the wake of the NFL's approval of the Rams' move to St. Louis, weekend reports centered on rumors the NFL is considering moving as many as three franchises to fill the now-open L.A. market. "Crazy or not ... there is talk of swapping franchises," writes S.A. Paolantonio in Philadelphia. One unnamed NFL source mentioned two possible scenarios: The Bengals to Baltimore; or the Bengals to Philadelphia's Veterans Stadium, with the Eagles moving to L.A. Eagles Owner Jeffrey Lurie called that report "absolute nonsense." Bengals President & GM Mike Brown: "I have not heard that, and I find that fairly strained." But Oilers Owner Bud Adams said there "has been some talk of it." Adams: "It's a helluva market out there. My lease is up in two years. I may want to take a look at L.A. myself." Another NFC owner said the Eagles "always come up in these discussions," but added that owners are "not stupid enough" to move the Eagles out of Philadelphia's No. 4 media market. The league wants an NFC team in L.A., and Lurie, a movie producer, "would seem a perfect fit." But Paolantonio writes that moving the Eagles "seems heretical even for the NFL's relentless pursuit of TV revenue" (PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 4/15). Fox Sports Spokesperson Vince Wladika called the Eagles rumor "baseless and groundless": "Why would we want a team leaving the No. 4 market?" (Mike Bruton, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 4/18). The "message" the Bengals' Brown took from the Rams vote was that "if a team wants to move, the NFL isn't going to fight it. Even if the team wants to come to Baltimore," according to Vito Stellino in Baltimore. On the Eagles, Stellino speculates if Raiders Owner Al Davis gets a new stadium at Hollywood Park, "Lurie could share it in this scenario" (Baltimore SUN, 4/16). RAIDERS GO HOLLYWOOD: The L.A. DAILY NEWS reports that the league will grant at least two Super Bowls and a "undisclosed sum of money" within the next two weeks to help build a Hollywood Park facility that would be home to UCLA and the Raiders (SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 4/15). In discussions with NFL owners about building a stadium at Hollywood Park, Davis said $60M could be raised from the sale of PSL's. But Davis also would want three Super Bowls within a 10-year span, with 10,000 seats for each Super Bowl "set aside" for luxury and club seat buyers in addition to the 8,000 regularly reserved for the host team. Davis reportedly will not let an NFC team share the facility. The Raiders stadium situation "will remain in the air" until the May league meetings in Jacksonville (Will McDonough, BOSTON GLOBE, 4/16). An L.A. TIMES editorial states "it's hard to argue with the logic" of the proposed Hollywood Park deal, citing the private financing and the boost to the economy from future Super Bowls (L.A. TIMES, 4/16). IS FOX A WINNER OR LOSER? Despite losing L.A., Fox will "escape with little or no ratings damage over the remaining three years of its contract," according to Jim Thomas in St. Louis. Thomas writes the rebate was a "phantom issue" since there was no provision in Fox's contract stating they had to have a team in L.A. (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 4/16). But in New York, Steve Zipay sees Fox as a big "loser," as is KTTV, Fox's L.A. affiliate. Zipay's Winners: NBC, which televises AFC games and has the rights to the Raiders; and Logo Athletic, which has exclusive rights to St. Louis Rams apparel (NEWSDAY, 4/14). Possible "restitution" for Fox will "likely come in subsequent seasons, and potentially, on a non-cash basis" (Thomas Tyrer, ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 4/17 issue). Fox Sports' Wladika wouldn't respond to reports the NFL "promised" Fox a $12M rebate. He did say talks between the network and league were "ongoing" (Mike Bruton, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 4/18).