Group Created with Sketch.
Volume 26 No. 47

Leagues and Governing Bodies

Yesterday marked the first time a NASCAR Cup Series playoff race was not held at a traditional oval
Photo: GETTY IMAGES

Charlotte Motor Speedway yesterday debuted its "Roval" course for NASCAR's Cup Series playoff race there, and it was a "complete and total success," according to Brendan Marks of the CHARLOTTE OBSERVER. Critics "won’t be so easy on the Roval," as they will "complain that it’s not conventional driving." They will "lament" wreckage in the final seven laps that "drastically altered not only the course of the race but of the playoffs for a handful of drivers." Marks: "They’re wrong." Fans were "packed into the grandstands" yesterday. SMI President & CEO Marcus Smith said, "The roar from the fans was all I needed to know that that was the moment that everybody will remember for a long time." Marks notes the Roval was a "complete gamble, Smith’s brainchild that he has tweaked and tinkered with for years." At this point in NASCAR’s history and standing in the American sports landscape, the Roval "should be proof to accept and lean into even more of those gambles" (CHARLOTTE OBSERVER, 10/1). NBCSN's Nate Ryan said, "We’ve been giving him credit all week, but Marcus Smith investing millions of dollars to upgrade this road course … acknowledging that it’s a mile-and-a-half oval, but it had been disappointing with the fall races. Marcus was very candid about that, that he needed to do something to keep this race from being overshadowed by the All-Star Race, by the 600, and now the conversation becomes do other mile-and-a-half ovals try this?” (“NASCAR Victory Lap,” NBCSN, 9/30).

A GOOD LOOK: Motorsports reporter Jeff Gluck wrote the hype for the Roval "was real, the freshness of a new course injected a boost of enthusiasm into a long season and the whole thing replaced a traditionally ho-hum event with a huge unknown." Gluck: "The unofficial winners were many: Marcus Smith, the father of the Roval who saw his brainchild come to life in a majorly successful way; NASCAR, which continues to have an excellently fun second half of the season; and the fans who came from all over the country to check the Roval out for themselves, then surely left feeling like they got their money’s worth" (JEFFGLUCK.com, 9/30). NBC's Jeff Burton said, "You wanted those guys that came to this race, you wanted people that watched on TV, to leave feeling good about it, and I don’t know how you couldn’t." He added, "It was a success. Now, you are not going to make everybody happy, but by far, the majority of people that came here today will want to come back and the people that watched on TV will want to watch it in person" ("NASCAR Victory Lap," NBCSN, 9/30). In Daytona Beach, Dalton Hopkins writes the Roval experiment "was a success." Not only did the Roval "impress fans -- social media reaction, too, was extremely positive -- but some touted its advantages over other road courses on the Cup Series because the course is confined within the oval track" (Daytona Beach NEWS-JOURNAL, 10/1).

RUBBIN'S RACIN': ESPN.com's Bob Pockrass wrote yesterday's race was a "win for NASCAR at a time when it could really use it." This was "more than just another race." There were relatively "few incidents until the final 43 laps." However, fans will "remember a wild ending, and this one had all of that at the front and as drivers attempted to earn enough points to advance in the playoffs" (ESPN.com, 9/30). The AP's Jenna Fryer noted the race was "much cleaner than expected after two crash-heavy days of practice, but action picked up in the closing laps." Brad Keselowski was on track to win before he "misjudged the entry into the first turn on a restart with six laps remaining." It triggered a "multicar accident that also collected Kyle Larson" (AP, 9/30).

MOVING FORWARD: ESPN.com's Pockrass listed some advice to new NASCAR President Steve Phelps. First is the schedule, where it is "time for action." Whether Phelps can finally "figure out a way to move some races from tracks without significantly depleting the bottom line of the two major track operators remains to be seen." It will be "easier if NASCAR is willing to actually buy dates back." Next is the rules package, which Phelps will "defer to his competition team" led by Exec VP & Chief Racing Development Officer Steve O'Donnell to "make most of those decisions." Then there is team solvency and talent development, where NASCAR "needs to find ways to develop the true talent from its weekly short tracks." Pockrass also listed the need for "leadership stability" in NASCAR. He also noted the need for "openness on issues." Phelps did try to be a "little bit more 'real' than his comments in August when he questioned why there was such a negative narrative on the sport." Finally, there is the TV and digital platforms, where Phelps "needs to start looking at how NASCAR sells its digital rights and if it could go to some type of streaming service" (ESPN.com, 9/28).

Former NFL Exec VP/Business Ventures Eric Grubman called a report from Bleacher Report's Mike Freeman that he is attempting to move a team to San Diego "absolutely not true." Appearing on San Diego-based XEPRS-AM on Friday, Grubman said, "There is 0.0 truth to that rumor. I don't know where Mike got it from." He said of bringing the NFL back to the city, "I haven't given it any thought. Not one iota." Grubman said of the Chargers' move to L.A., "I don't speak for the NFL, but I'm highly confident that the Chargers would say to you, 'We didn't believe it would necessarily be a bed of roses. We did the best we can on a temporary stadium. The real picture you want to look at is not one year out, or two years out, but ten years out.'" He said L.A. is a "big, vibrant market," which is why the Chargers moved there. It "wasn't because San Diego was a bad market, it was because they couldn't get a stadium done" ("The Scott & BR Show," XEPRS-AM, 9/28). PRO FOOTBALL TALK's Mike Florio noted Freeman "didn’t back off despite the denial" from Grubman. Freeman wrote on Twitter, “I feel very confident that what I was told was accurate." He added that Grubman has "told people he’s involved in trying to take a team to San Diego." Freeman: “San Diego is NOT off the market for an NFL team” (PROFOOTBALLTALK.com, 9/28). Bleacher Report's Freeman on Friday afternoon originally tweeted, "One thing I'm hearing: Eric Grubman, with Goldman Sachs before joining the NFL as an exec, is exploring possibility of moving a CURRENT team to San Diego. Nothing imminent. The fact Grubman has even contemplated this has angered some in the NFL." The L.A. Daily News' Vincent Bonsignore shortly after that tweeted, "Just spoke with former #NFL executive Eric Grubman about report he’s trying to move a current #NFL team to San Diego. His quote: 'completely and utterly bogus information. Zero merit. Zero. Zero.'" Freeman followed up: "1. Wasn't really a 'report.' 2. Grubman has told people this. 3. I'm more than comfortable with what I tweeted" (TWITTER.com, 9/28).

Two former Redskins cheerleaders who previously spoke anonymously about sexual harassment while working for the team now are speaking on the record "about their experiences and their frustrations at what they consider the slow pace of change to protect NFL cheerleaders from degrading treatment," according to Juliet Macur of the N.Y. TIMES. Rebecca Cummings and Allison Cassidy said that they "agreed to be named now to bolster the credibility of their allegations." Cummings said, "Our main goal was for the Redskins to make a safe working environment for the cheerleaders." Macur noted the Redskins after the Times report in May "conducted a three-month investigation into their cheerleading program." The internal inquiry "determined that 'all aspects'" of the harassment allegations "were accurate, but that what the women described was 'greatly exaggerated.'" The investigation led the Redskins to "make changes this season intended to improve the safety of cheerleaders and to portray the team as more family-friendly." Those changes include "new uniforms, which show slightly less skin, for a group of cheerleaders who mingle with fans but do not perform on the sidelines." The cheerleaders also will "no longer be assigned to private events." Cummings and Cassidy said that those changes, "while welcome, fell short of their expectations of broader moves to eliminate the culture of harassment, such as the removal of the program’s leadership that intimidated cheerleaders into silence." Across the NFL, several teams have "made adjustments to their programs" (N.Y. TIMES, 9/30).