Group Created with Sketch.
Volume 24 No. 156


Anschutz Co.'s plan to sell AEG has “thrown a new curve in the two-decade quest to bring professional football back” to L.A., “leaving some allies at City Hall blindsided and forcing Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to explain why he did not divulge the information sooner,” according to Zahniser & Linthicum of the L.A. TIMES. Villaraigosa and other city leaders yesterday insisted that AEG's plan to build the $1.2B Farmers Field in downtown L.A. is “still on track, with the proposal expected to sail through” the city council next week. Officials said that the "only potential hangup” is if new owners "seek to change the complex and carefully negotiated financial agreements.” Community members yesterday argued that a key vote on the stadium deal “should be delayed until taxpayers know who is going to run AEG.” But Villaraigosa said, “Whoever is buying this team is going to live by the deal that we negotiated.” A “combative Villaraigosa defended his decision to keep the information secret.” He said that AEG “did not request he do so.” If the council acts next week, the stadium financing agreements still “won't be executed until AEG shows that it has acquired a team.” That process “could take at least until next spring, when NFL owners meet and could consider possible franchise moves” (L.A. TIMES, 9/20). L.A. City Council member Jan Perry said that she “did not know about a pending sale, but agreed that it wouldn't have adverse effects on courting a team.” Perry added that the move "'arguably is very positive’ because she suspected it could lead to an enthusiastic new partner anxious to get in on the city’s NFL prospects” (AP, 9/19).

STORMY WEATHER? YAHOO SPORTS’ Jason Cole wrote “this bit of news clouds the situation once again." The NFL "badly wanted [AEG Chair Phil] Anschutz to be part of the deal, whether he just built the downtown stadium or bought the team." The "rule of thumb in the NFL is that the league doesn't go to anyone. It has people come to the league. That wasn't the case with Anschutz. Thus, removing him from the process is not a positive” (, 9/19). In L.A., Vincent Bonsignore in a front-page piece writes the AEG sale is “a good thing” for Farmers Field. Bonsignore: "Better to find out now, rather than later, Anschutz wasn't fully prepared to emotionally and financially march down the aisle with the NFL” (L.A. DAILY NEWS, 9/20).

BIG PRICE, SMALL POOL: In L.A., Vincent, Hamilton & Tangel in a front-page piece write that news of the sale “sent potential buyers scrambling to launch bids that insiders say could reach” $7B or more. The big question is, “Who can pony up enough cash to buy such marquee properties as Staples Center, L.A. Live and the Los Angeles Kings?” A “likely scenario is a group of investors similar to the consortium that bought the Dodgers.” AEG has “indicated privately that it expects to sell” for $5-7B, but “no official price has been set.” Lakers investor Patrick Soon-Shiong has “already expressed interest,” and Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban and investment firm Colony Capital are “seen in the running.” Real estate brokerage firm Cushman & Wakefield Chair John Cushman said that “a ‘healthy number’ of potential bidders already have expressed interest since the sale was announced.” Vincent, Hamilton & Tangel note another "logical contender” is MSG. Meanwhile, Dodgers Owner Guggenheim Partners could be “a wild card.” Dodgers President Stan Kasten yesterday “declined to say whether Guggenheim executives had asked him about the feasibility of owning and operating multiple sports franchises” (L.A. TIMES, 9/20).

HOT PROPERTIES: Concert business publication Pollstar Editor Gary Bongiovanni said, "The $6 billion or $7 billion figure I've seen floating around out there actually seems kind of low.” Bongiovanni added, "The marquee assets are going to bring strong valuation” (, 9/20). In L.A., Fritz & Verrier report the sale “excludes two key entertainment assets: Family film company Walden Media and a controlling stake in theater chain Regal Entertainment Group" (L.A. TIMES, 9/20). SportsCorp President Marc Ganis said that AEG “will likely attract a diverse group of buyers,” as the company has assets in London, Brazil, Malaysia, Australia and Qatar, plus “a thriving concert ticket business.” Ganis added that a real estate investment trust “could partner with a live entertainment company to buy AEG” and that the company’s L.A. holdings “may be considered the most lucrative.” However, in L.A., Dakota Smith in a front-page piece notes that “selling some of the real-estate holdings may prove more difficult.” The "timing of the sale is a bit awkward for city officials, who now find themselves bombarded with questions." Meanwhile, AEG President & CEO Tim Leiweke said that the L.A. "football project isn't a major asset in the portfolio." Leiweke: "This isn't driving the (sale) process or the valuation of AEG" (L.A. DAILY NEWS, 9/20). The FINANCIAL TIMES’ Andrew Hill wrote, “Where Mr. Anschutz scores points is in his willingness to sell even high-profile investments.” Hill: “He has chosen his moment -- rather than having it dictated by creditors or other third parties -- and the fact he seems prepared to allow business to override sentiment is a lesson other investors in high-profile assets might well wish to learn” (, 9/19).

SLOW YOUR ROLL: In San Diego, Nick Canepa notes NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has "announced that any franchise interested in relocating to L.A. must file its intentions to the league by January." Chargers Special Counsel Mark Fabiani said, “We want to work with the new mayor and get something done here (and hopefully get it on the November 2013 ballot). I would be shocked if we filed an application in January.” Fabiani added, “This isn’t like selling a car. It will take months and months to sell it.” Fabiani: “No. 1, they assume Anschutz will sell, and he’s a tough negotiator. No. 2, there’s the assumption the NFL will want it to happen. These are huge assumptions. To tell you the truth, I should be saying this is a grave threat to San Diego, but it isn’t. If and when somebody buys AEG, that new person may not like the agreement with the city. A long time ago Tim Leiweke said they’d break ground in June 2012. Here we are in September and they still don’t have a certified EIR and now they may not even have an owner” (SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, 9/20).

STEADY AS SHE GOES: Nets and Barclays Center CEO Brett Yormark noted the sale of AEG “won’t affect its partnership with the Barclays Center ... even as one expert identified rival Madison Square Garden as the ideal buyer." Yormark: “We have no concerns. We’re confident after speaking with (AEG) that it’s business as usual regardless of who buys them and when.” In N.Y., Bondy & O’Keeffe note AEG Facilities was “hired by the Barclays Center last year to ‘provide operational support’” (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 9/20). In Germany, Jörg Lubrich wrote the news generated an "uneasy feeling" with hockey club Eisbären Berlin, one of two German hockey clibs owned by AEG. Eisbären Berlin Managing Dir Peter Lee "tried to calm the situation." He said, "O2 World and Eisbären belong together. We provide the arena with about 30 events, our home games, every year. We are an important renter" (BILD, 9/19).

The NFL Panthers are “working on a plan to refurbish 16-year-old Bank of America Stadium, which will likely include tens of millions of dollars for new video boards, escalators to the upper bowl and less glamorous fixes like new HVAC systems,” according to a front-page piece by Steve Harrison of the CHARLOTTE OBSERVER. Team President Danny Morrison “expects the long-range plan to be finished by the end of the season.” He declined to say “whether the team will seek public support for the renovations.” Morrison also “declined to say how much the team expects the renovations to cost.” Charlotte Mayor Anthony Foxx “appears to be open about helping the city’s NFL team, even though that would likely require far more public money.” Foxx Tuesday sent a letter to Panthers Owner Jerry Richardson inviting him to “discuss (stadium renovation plans) with the city council.” Morrison said that there “would be no major design changes to the stadium, which rules out any sort of retractable roof.” He added that the team “will likely install escalators to whisk fans to the upper bowl.” In addition, Morrison said that the team “would likely install larger video boards.” K.C.-based Populous is “leading the design team for the stadium.” Harrison notes there are now “only a handful of teams with stadiums older than the Panthers’ that haven’t had" a major overhaul (CHARLOTTE OBSERVER, 9/20).

Prospective Browns Owner Jimmy Haslam III "has not committed to adding a retractable roof to Cleveland Browns Stadium, but he assured members of Cleveland City Council that he’ll explore the possibility," according to Nate Ulrich of the AKRON BEACON JOURNAL. In a meet-and-greet yesterday, Council member Michael Polensek said that he "hopes the city and Haslam can hold future discussions about the possibility, if there is one, of attaching a roof to the lakefront stadium." Haslam said, "We are completely open-minded, and we want to provide really two things: one, a great experience for our fans at a Browns game; the other thing, secondly ... we want to use that facility as much as we possibly can, want to use it more than we can now. So anything that helps us do that, I’m certainly not at all saying we’re gonna do that, but we’ll certainly take a look at it." Browns coach Pat Shurmur said, "I like the setting that we present on game day here. I’m not really trying to visualize anything different at this point. ... I think some of the charm of, at least of what I’ve experienced so far here in Cleveland, is kind of the late-season, wintry setting." Ulrich notes Haslam yesterday also "attended practice in the afternoon at the team’s headquarters and later participated in a conference call with former and current suite and season-ticket holders." Shurmur said, "He is around quite a bit. He just spent a lot of money for a football team, and he wants to get to know us" (AKRON BEACON JOURNAL, 9/20).

Edmonton Mayor Stephen Mandel "sent a formal letter Wednesday morning to Oilers owner Daryl Katz, inviting him or his representative to speak to city council" about the team's proposed downtown arena project, according to Elise Stolte of the EDMONTON JOURNAL. Mandel said that discussing the arena in public with all city council members "will allow both parties to better understand the other’s position." He added that the Edmonton City Council is "committed to the October 2011 arena agreement and if Katz wants to propose changes, he should do it in a public setting." Mandel: “If there’s problems with whatever he’s looking at, he needs to come forward and bring evidence to city council and to the citizens of Edmonton to show there needs to be a change to it." Mandel said of what it would mean if Katz does not respond, “Then that makes a statement, doesn’t it?” (EDMONTON JOURNAL, 9/20). A Katz Group spokesperson in an e-mail wrote the company was "aware of Mandel's request." The GLOBE & MAIL's Dean Bennet writes the "standoff" has put the C$475M arena project "in limbo." Mandel's invitation to the Katz Group is meant for the Oilers ownership to "spell out in detail in a full public council meeting what it wants." Mandel: "I think everybody’s frustrated. Everybody wants to see us move ahead with this within the parameters of something reasonable for everybody" (GLOBE & MAIL, 9/20).