NFL Senior VP/PR Greg Aiello yesterday argued with a report last week by ESPN that indicated that the NFLPA "had taken a compromise position on the revenue split issue before talks were cut off last week," according to Hank Gola of the N.Y. DAILY NEWS. Aiello in a post on the NFL's labor website wrote, "Saying they want 50% of this new revenue base, is the same thing as saying they want 60% of the existing revenue base. It is a status quo deal." Aiello: "Any interpretation that this was a new proposal and a move toward the clubs is not accurate. This was an offer to keep things where they are, to simply extend the status quo. It is consistent with what the union has been saying for two years -- just keep the current deal in place. As (NFLPA president) Kevin Mawae has acknowledged, the players got a great deal in 2006." Gola writes Aiello's comments continue to "illustrate how little the sides agree" (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 2/17). In St. Petersburg, Rick Stroud reports the NFLPA "held a conference call with union reps of all 32 teams Tuesday to revisit the possibility of decertifying in the event of a lockout" when the CBA expires March 4. Buccaneers C and player rep Jeff Faine said decertifying is "our last resort," but is "an action we will take." Faine: "There's a sense we're all still on board and want to do that." Faine "describes himself as a 'hopeless optimist'" in regard to the negotiations, but he "fears that NFL owners do not view March 4 as a hard deadline, particularly since players don't get paid their salaries until the regular season." Meanwhile, Faine said that "not only will the owners proposal of an 18-game regular season shorten players' careers, they'll earn less money for more work." Faine: "I still feel like it's a bargaining chip. If it is, I'm sure that's something we may go to. If it's something they're stuck on, I think it's a terrible idea. There's nothing good in it, except for the owners" (ST. PETERSBURG TIMES, 2/17).
Bucs' Faine says decertification
is a "last resort"
IMPACT ON TEAMS: The Raiders yesterday signed DT Richard Seymour to a two-year deal worth $30M, but National Football Post President Andrew Brandt said more teams are not signing players to extensions because they are "sort of taking shelter in the fact that it's so uncertain." Brandt: "We don't know if there's going to be a cap. We don't know what the cap's going to be. We don't know what the rules are going to be. We don't know how many years towards free agency. That seems to be holding it up. Also, the rules of the uncapped year are still in place" ("NFL Live," ESPN, 2/16). Meanwhile, Eagles President Joe Banner said of the ramifications of a potential lockout, "There's opportunities in all challenges, so whether that's personnel opportunities, because there's a shorter window, so maybe a team that has better preparation in terms of evaluating the players, maybe a team that has multiple people capable of negotiating difficult contracts at the same time, when most teams only have one, maybe the fact that we will have more flexibility probably than most teams from a cap perspective (will be a plus) -- so we're trying to look at it as an opportunity." In Philadelphia, Les Bowen notes there is a "possibility of organizational layoffs during the anticipated lockout." But Banner said, "There will be an extended period where everybody here will be paid" (PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS, 2/17).
SLOWED GROWTH: The WALL STREET JOURNAL's Matthew Futterman writes the "larger question behind this entire labor fight is a notion that's familiar to investors, but that represents a radical notion in professional sports: the idea that a sports league, like a giant company, must show steady growth over time." Futterman: "And more radically, a slowdown in the rate of growth, even without actual losses, is sufficient grounds to ask labor to make concessions." The NFL "earned a record $9 billion in revenues this season," and it "bears no resemblance to other major U.S. sports leagues that have faced labor Armageddon." Every NFL franchise is, "by most accounts, profitable and competitive." But owners are "about $1 billion short of the growth in real dollars they were projecting the last time labor negotiations came down to the wire" in '06, and "newer forms of business, like digital media, don't show the obvious potential for huge returns." NFL Exec VP/Business Operations Eric Grubman acknowledged that the "loss of public funding for stadiums has forced owners to put up more money for 'capital costs.'" Grubman added that it is "going to be 'difficult' to push ticket prices higher, though he is optimistic that broadcast fees will rise" (WALL STREET JOURNAL, 2/17).