Group Created with Sketch.
Volume 24 No. 117
  • Created with Sketch.
  • Created with Sketch.
  • Created with Sketch.


     The state of Maryland and the Maryland Stadium Authority
filed a $36M federal antitrust suit against the NFL and 29 of its
30 teams "in an attempt to hasten the move of the Cleveland
Browns to Baltimore for the 1996 season," according to the
WASHINGTON POST.  Maryland Stadium Authority Chair John Moag
announced the filing of the suit in Baltimore District Court by
saying they were "prompted by the illegal failure of the NFL to
approve the move."  NFL owners ended their January meetings in
Atlanta yesterday with no decision on the Browns' move.  Moag:
"This is obviously a preemptory move on our part."  The suit
claims the league violated state and federal antitrust laws by
preventing the Authority from competing for teams, asserting its
right to block the move, injuring the Authority financially
(delays will cost more than $30M in extra bond payments), and
injuring the MD economy.  The suit seeks to an order banning the
NFL from interfering as well as fines and damages.  NFL
Commissioner Paul Tagliabue said the Browns issue will be taken
up at a special meeting on February 8-9, at a location to be
determined.  Tagliabue said at that time he will deliver his
report on the Browns situation and possibly a personal
recommendation one way or the other (Leonard Shapiro, WASHINGTON
POST, 1/19).
     LOOKING AHEAD:  There was "speculation" that the owners
would vote in February to approve the move while promising
Cleveland a team once a new stadium is built.  But Fred Nance,
lead attorney for the city of Cleveland, said a non-binding
promise is not acceptable.  Tagliabue said the league would not
force the Bucs to move to Cleveland to resolve the matter, but he
left open the possibility of that happening on its own (Hubbuch &
Adams, Akron BEACON JOURNAL, 1/19).  Yesterday, while noting that
"insiders say there is nothing to the Tampa Bay part of this
triangle," Will McDonough reported "preliminary talks have begun"
to get the Bucs to Cleveland with an eye on a settlement before a
February vote (BOSTON GLOBE, 1/18).  USA TODAY's Gordon Forbes:
"The big question:  Would Malcom Glazer and Art Modell consider
swapping franchises, Glazer keeping the Browns in Cleveland and
Modell moving the Bucs to Baltimore?" (USA TODAY, 1/19).  Today's
TAMPA TRIBUNE reiterates that three league sources say the
Glazers have had talks with an unnamed "point man" in Cleveland,
but NFL Counsel Jay Moyer said, "They haven't said to us that
they want to move" (Yasinskas & Henderson, TAMPA TRIBUNE, 1/19).
     LABOR DEAL ALSO DELAYED:  The owners also failed to vote on
the extension of the current CBA with the players.  The league is
expected also to take up that issue at the special February
meeting (WASHINGTON POST, 1/19).  McDonough reports there is a
revenue-sharing deal in the works in which the teams with the
most lucrative stadium deals would share with lesser teams