I was IM-ing from Beijing to St. Paul, Minn., with my lovely wife today. She asked the probing question: How do these Olympics rank in your scheme of things?

You gotta understand. I’ve been married to Ann for 22 years, but I’ve been engaged to the Olympics since 1984. I’ve often been asked my favorite Games, and the two that always come out of my mouth first are the 1992 Barcelona Summer Olympics and the 1994 Lillehammer Winter Games.

But her question gave me pause.

We have a full week to go until the Beijing Games end. But I think they are living up to the expectations, both good and bad. I believe the Games are as much a “world event” as a “sports event,” and that adds real gravitas to them.

Everything we anticipated — from terrific facilities to unacceptable Web blocking and arrests of protesters — has been delivered. These Games are so political and corporate that they reflect more of what the Olympics have become. You cannot ignore the political and economic realities of these Games. They are readily apparent.

On the other hand, the sports performances have been impressive. Michael Phelps’ performance is off any measurable chart. Usain Bolt’s 100-meter world record Saturday night will be remembered. We still have the men’s basketball tournament to play out. The Lopez siblings could get three medals for the same family in taekwondo. There’s lots still to unfold.

Still, I’m beginning to see my meter move on “Best Games Ever.” No conclusion yet. And the authoritarian nature of the government makes me want to NOT call these the best Olympics I’ve been to. I don’t want to give the regime too much credit.

But you can’t deny what’s real. For now, the Beijing Games are important, exciting and special. Barcelona, watch out. You might get bumped down on my list.