SportsBusiness Daily — Sports Business Resources — your sports business news and information source. Learn More
Advanced
Home About Us Advertise With Us Marketplace/Classifieds College & University Program Subscribe/Trial My Account

Thursday
October 28, 2004
Print This Issue


 
MOST VIEWED STORIES
View the top 20 stories
 
Recent Issues
Sponsorships, Advertising & Marketing

Bad Communication: Michigan Dumps Title Sponsor Proposal

Alumni Backlash Forces
Michigan To Can SBC Deal

The Univ. of Michigan (UM) has “pulled out of” a two-year deal with SBC Communications to title sponsor its annual football game against Ohio State (OSU), according to Michael Rosenberg of the DETROIT FREE PRESS. The deal would have paid each school $265,000 a year, but “a lot of alumni complained about the proposal, and now U-M says it will respect its ‘traditions’ and values.’” Michigan AD Bill Martin indicated that he “failed to grasp the impact of selling naming rights,” saying, “I did not focus on the naming aspect of this thing soon enough. There is nobody to blame in this situation but me” (DETROIT FREE PRESS, 10/28). Also in Detroit, Fred Girard reports UM President Mary Sue Coleman “killed the proposal.” Martin: “When this surfaced to the presidential level, and we reviewed the details with Mary Sue, she was very strong on this, and very adamant that there were just some issues here we couldn’t go along with” (DETROIT NEWS, 10/28). More Martin: “The money was not the issue. We didn’t even talk about the money. It was a matter from president Coleman’s perspective and mine in the final analysis that this was inconsistent with the values that we share with the greater Michigan family.” Martin estimated that 80% of e-mails and phone calls from UM alumni “opposed the SBC deal,” and the other 20% understood “the realities — if you don’t (sell naming rights), what’s going to happen to our ticket prices?” (AP, 10/27).

OSU: OSU AD Andy Geiger in a statement said, “It became apparent that this agreement could detract from the great tradition of the game itself” (Mult., 10/28). Geiger indicated that there was “some unhappiness at Ohio State, too, although he said he did not get any negative feedback from the university’s trustees.” Geiger said the deal fell through because of a “combination of negative reaction and our inability to adjust enough to all the concerns to make it work” (COLUMBUS DISPATCH, 10/28). OSU SID Steve Snapp said that the school “had received feedback from fans both positive and negative” (AKRON BEACON JOURNAL, 10/28).


Get A Free Trial To SportsBusiness Daily

Reader Comments

To post comments on this article, log in or register for a free trial.

Related Stories By Company Related Stories By Sport
Favorite College Basketball Teams
March 19, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

CBS' NCAA Tourney Day One Nets 4.6 Overnight
March 19, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

MMOD Receives Generally High Marks
March 19, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

Capital One Launches New Viral Campaign
March 19, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

Nike Has 52 Teams In Women's Tourney
March 19, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

ALSO IN THIS SECTION


A Publication of Street & Smith's Sports Group.
Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (REVISED 2009-06-23) and Privacy Policy (REVISED 2009-06-23).

© 2010 Street & Smith's Sports Group and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Street & Smith's Sports Group.