SportsBusiness Daily — Sports Business Resources — your sports business news and information source. Learn More
Advanced
Home About Us Advertise With Us Marketplace/Classifieds College & University Program Subscribe/Trial My Account

Tuesday
April 22, 2003
Print This Issue


 
MOST VIEWED STORIES
View the top 20 stories
 
Recent Issues
Franchises

Raiders In Court: Coliseum Responds; Trademark Suit Tossed

Attorneys for the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Board yesterday in a cross examination of former Board President George Vukasin made the argument that Raiders Owner Al Davis "had several chances to make a sold-out stadium a condition of the team's return," but did not, according to Paul Rosynsky of the OAKLAND TRIBUNE. Coliseum attorney James Brosnahan "used various documents to show the Coliseum was never in charge of marketing season tickets or [PSLs], and therefore should not be held responsible" for the non-sellouts (OAKLAND TRIBUNE, 4/22). But in Sacramento, Ramon Coronado reports that attorneys for the Raiders produced a July '95 press release that stated the games for that season "were sold out in the first round of a marketing effort." Vukasin, in his third day of testimony, admitted that the press release "was wrong." Vukasin: "I was under the impression during the month of July and August that all seats were sold." Vukasin added that while his name appeared on the press release, it was "prepared by others who worked out of a `confused' marketing office, headed by Marc Ganis, who was later fired." Meanwhile, Judge Richard Park said, "The animosity I've seen in this case is the worst I've seen in 19 years." During Vukasin's testimony, Park "scolded the lawyers in front of the jury for lacing their questions with `editorial comment and lectures'" (SACRAMENTO BEE, 4/22).

UNMARKED: In CA, Barry Witt reports that Santa Clara Co. Judge John Herlihy has dismissed the Raiders' suit seeking to prevent the Bucs and Panthers from wearing their uniforms in CA because they violate the Raiders' trademark rights. Herlihy did not rule on the merits of the case, but said that the issue "would have to be resolved in federal court." The team is considering filing in federal court (SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS, 4/22).


Get A Free Trial To SportsBusiness Daily

Reader Comments

To post comments on this article, log in or register for a free trial.

Related Stories By Company Related Stories By Sport
John Riggins Bashes Dan Snyder
November 6, 2009 : SportsBusiness Daily

WAC Hires PR Firm To Help Boise State
November 5, 2009 : SportsBusiness Daily

Randy Lerner Opens Up About Browns
November 5, 2009 : SportsBusiness Daily

Touchdown Jacksonville Revived To Aid Jags
November 5, 2009 : SportsBusiness Daily

Browns Refuse To Publicly Discuss Kokinis
November 4, 2009 : SportsBusiness Daily

ALSO IN THIS SECTION


A Publication of Street & Smith's Sports Group.
Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (REVISED 2009-06-23) and Privacy Policy (REVISED 2009-06-23).

© 2009 Street & Smith's Sports Group and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Street & Smith's Sports Group.