SportsBusiness Daily — Sports Business Resources — your sports business news and information source. Learn More
Advanced
Home About Us Advertise With Us Marketplace/Classifieds College & University Program Subscribe/Trial My Account

Thursday
May 29, 2008
Print This Issue


 
MOST VIEWED STORIES
View the top 20 stories
 
Recent Issues
Leagues & Governing Bodies

Disputed Calls In MLB Spur Mixed Opinions On Use Of Instant Replay

With calls for instant replay in MLB increasing after several disputed home run calls in recent weeks, THE DAILY presents a wrap-up of columns and opinions on whether the league should implement use of the technology.

NO REASON NOT TO USE IT: In Milwaukee, Tom Haudricourt wrote, "It's ridiculous for an umpire to make an improper call on a home run, the biggest play in the game. The [NFL] figured out you can't let an official miss a touchdown, and MLB should follow suit." Umpires should "be given access to a monitor to make a call in a timely fashion if there is any confusion whatsoever" (MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL, 5/25). In Chicago, Greg Couch wrote the issue is a "no-brainer. Baseball needs to use instant replay. Now. Set it up over the next two days, with a little booth in the press box for a replay umpire, use it in practice for two games and put it in use first thing next week" (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 5/28). In St. Louis, Bryan Burwell: "I just want to know why baseball needs a study to determine whether instant replay can help improve its game. Why can't baseball just say it's way past time to institute replay as a useful tool, and after the All-Star break have the replay booths in place and be done with it?" (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 5/27). SI.com's Tom Verducci wrote of umpires missing home run calls, "How exactly is this good for baseball?" Verducci: "Commissioner Bud Selig, your time to act is now. ... What Selig should do is push the umpires and the [MLBPA] to sign off on instant replay immediately, to be instituted after the All-Star break. Baseball embarrasses itself with each blown home run call in the interim and risks a playoff race decided by a clear-cut injustice" (SI.com, 5/28). CBSSPORTS.com's Gregg Doyel: "A missed call here or there doesn't seem to matter in May. And that's true. ... A mistake in October will matter a ton" (CBSSPORTS.com, 5/27). In Dallas, Tim Cowlishaw writes of umpires gathering to collectively determine calls, "This is a process that [MLB] needs to rid itself of, before a World Series game is determined by one of these silly umpire 'what-do-you-think-happened' chats." Cowlishaw: "The modern ballparks cry out for replay to be used on home run calls" (DALLAS MORNING NEWS, 5/29).

Will Instant Replay Solve Manager-Umpire Disputes?
BREAKING WITH TRADITION: In Denver, Woody Paige noted MLB officials "cite 'tradition of the game'" for not instituting instant replay. Paige: "Is the DH tradition? Where's the tradition of interleague play and the All-Star Game winner determining home-field advantage in the World Series?" (DENVER POST, 5/28). In Virginia, Bob Molinaro wrote human error always will "be part of the game, of course, but to listen to replay opponents, you'd think potentially game-changing mistakes were something for baseball to cherish, not weed out" (Norfolk VIRGINIAN-PILOT, 5/26). SPORTINGNEWS.com's Jim Ryan: "No one wants baseball games to become appreciably longer, but it would be worth waiting a few extra minutes to ensure that crucial calls such as home runs are made correctly. Besides, the effect on game length would be negligible" (SPORTINGNEWS.com, 5/26). In Cleveland, Bud Shaw wrote the case that replay "would slow down the game is ... weak." Shaw: "Getting clear-cut evidence on a home run ball would take less time than Friday's umpire convention [over a disputed call in the Rangers-Indians game] and the obligatory argument from [Indians manager Eric] Wedge that followed" (Cleveland PLAIN DEALER, 5/25). FOXSPORTS.com's Michael Rosenberg wrote, "Other than sentimentality, what is the argument against replay? Baseball replays won't slow down the games, like NFL replays do, because there just won't be that many" (FOXSPORTS.com, 5/26). In Baltimore, Peter Schmuck wrote Selig has "long been opposed to instant replay for a variety of reasons, and I generally agree with him. ... But a limited boundary system that determines whether a ball is a home run or not will only come into play on rare occasions in which one or more runs hang in the balance" (Baltimore SUN, 5/24). USA TODAY's Christine Brennan writes, "Give each manager one challenge per game. The manager can use it anytime he wishes. ... To prevent frivolous challenges ... there would be a penalty for asking for a replay on a call that was correct. You'd give up a ball or a strike on the spot, depending on whether you were in the field or at bat" (USA TODAY, 5/29).

BAD CALL: In West Palm Beach, Dave George wrote instant replay "slows down the game, trading the spontaneity of great athletes in the heat of competition for the specificity of technicians. ... This game is best served much rawer than that" (PALM BEACH POST, 5/27). In Westchester, Sam Borden wrote under the header "Replay Would Be A Bigger Mistake Than Blown Calls." Borden: "Instant replay is not progress. Instant replay is, on its most basic level, hypocritical and almost entirely antithetical to some of the most basic concepts baseball (and sports in general) typically embrace" (Westchester JOURNAL NEWS, 5/25). In Chicago, Rick Morrissey wrote the "best reason to say no to instant replay in baseball might seem like the silliest one: Who in his right mind wants to see the standard manager-umpire confrontation ... become extinct?" (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 5/25). In Atlanta, Terence Moore wrote under the header "Instant Replay Would Strip Baseball Of Its Soul." Moore: "No instant replay, please. Not in baseball, where breath-to-breath squabbles between umpires, managers, coaches and players are as much of the game's soul as the seventh-inning stretch, the national anthem and a box of Cracker Jack." Baseball HOFer Phil Niekro: "Umpires are human. They're going to make mistakes, and one of the thrills of a ballgame or of a season is when an umpire maybe blows one, and it could have gone either way, and the fans are getting on him" (ATLANTA CONSTITUTION, 5/24). Orioles P Jamie Walker: "The way I look at it is, they're going to make mistakes. We're all going to make mistakes. But let the umps make the call" (Baltimore SUN, 5/25).

AN UMPIRE'S TAKE: In an e-mail to ESPN's Buster Olney, an MLB umpire said, "I can tell you there isn't an umpire out on the field that wants to miss a call and then be forced to watch the highlights the rest of the evening." On potentially adding an umpire to each crew and rotating daily into a replay oversight position, the umpire said, "The problem with adding an additional umpire to each crew speaks to the commissioner's office willingness to take on more expenses. I would rather see, if they move in this direction, take retired umpires and put them up in the replay booth. This would allow for an easy transition from field to retirement" (ESPN.com, 5/27).


Get A Free Trial To SportsBusiness Daily

Reader Comments

To post comments on this article, log in or register for a free trial.

Related Stories By Company Related Stories By Sport
Cactus League Bill Passes Arizona House
March 19, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

Rangers React To Manager's Cocaine Use
March 18, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

Padres Spending To Develop Young Talent
March 17, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

MLB Partnering With Victoria's Secret
March 15, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

MLB's Floating Division Idea Getting Boos
March 11, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

Longoria To Appear In National New Era Ad
March 19, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

Cactus League Bill Passes Arizona House
March 19, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

Brewers Asked To Help With Miller Park Debt
March 19, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

Cubs Near Deal For Toyota Sign At Wrigley
March 18, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

Rangers React To Manager's Cocaine Use
March 18, 2010 : SportsBusiness Daily

ALSO IN THIS SECTION


A Publication of Street & Smith's Sports Group.
Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (REVISED 2009-06-23) and Privacy Policy (REVISED 2009-06-23).

© 2010 Street & Smith's Sports Group and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Street & Smith's Sports Group.