SBJ: The 2015 class of Forty Under 40 SBD: Nike Signs Mariota To Endorsement Deal SBJ: Levi’s Stadium numbers don’t lie SBG: Man City Waits On Outcome Of FFP Case SBG: Theo Walcott Leaves Nike For Adidas SBJ: Gambling a key topic at All-Star SBD: MLB Senior VP/Licensing Howard Smith Out SBD: MLB Considers Partial MLBAM Spin-Off SBJ: Concessionaires go deep with analytics SBG: Chelsea Signs $308M Deal With Yokohama
Athletic Directors Discuss the Economics of College Sports
December 6, 2012 10:04 AM
The Economics of College Sports
Lynn Hickey, UT-San Antonio
Tom Holmoe, BYU
Jim Livengood, UNLV
Wood Selig, Old Dominion
Making the jump to FBS
The effect of having a football team make the leap to the FBS has advantages not mentioned often on campus. The affiliation with Conference USA and its major metropolitan universities plays into Old Dominion’s academic ambition. “Our president’s goal is to get more out-of-state students,” said Selig. “It matches up perfectly with our effort to get wider branding, wider national visibility and expand our student population beyond the state of Virginia.”AD Lynne Hickey of Univ. of Texas-San Antonio said that the advantage for all sports programs in bringing recruits to the Alamodome compared to the previous recruiting landscape is monumental.
The pressure of making good hiring decisions with rising coaching salaries clearly affects the group. “If I want to make a decision to pay a coach X amount of dollars that might be above and beyond what we’ve traditionally done, it’s my responsibility to make sure that we have the revenue that’s going to back that up,” said Holmoe. Selig acknowledged that “if we lose (our popular football coach) and don’t make a really sincere, strong financial effort to keep him, we’re going to be following him out of town, without a job. There’s that fine line between not paying too much and trying to max out your resources to extend your coach.” Hickey added that as a start-up program, her school can’t focus on the arms race and must evaluate their hiring decisions against their peers.
College football playoff
All panelists thought that four teams was not enough for the new college playoff format. “I think that the natural number is closer to being eight,” said Livengood. Selig joked, “We’ve shown we always need more money in college athletics,” before adding, “If we can get more money and have a bigger playoff and people will step forward, it will then go from eight to 16.”
UNLV stadium situation
Livengood elaborated on the plan to build a 62,000-seat on-campus domed stadium for football at UNLV. “We’re trying to create much more of a residential campus than we have had in the past,” he said. He sees the stadium being used for multiple events, including bidding on a future Pac-12 football championship game. “I think that’s an automatic,” he said, “and at some point in time, I would hope the ability to host NCAA championships, as well.”
BYU and independence
The new four-team playoff makes bowl affiliation for BYU football much tougher, according to Holmoe. “It looks now like it’s going right back to what it was with conference affiliations and bowl games,” he said. “You look at Notre Dame, who is one of, if not the most powerful brand in college football, and they went and put themselves in a bowl affiliation with the ACC because of the changing times.” Holmoe made it clear that BYU uses Notre Dame as a blueprint as an independent.