Menu
In-Depth

Tennis: Advantage technology

Roger Federer is ready to receive serve. The camera zooms in on the suave, elegant Swiss, a global superstar. A back wall behind has a sponsor logo, just the kind of juxtaposition a company covets … except there is a person, hunched over, standing in front of the brand sign, seemingly right over the 18-time Grand Slam winner’s shoulder.

That someone is of course the lines official (at the Miami Open they wore straw hats, looking very much like the retirees at nearby beaches). A tennis court is a crowded affair, with a chair umpire, and six to seven lines officials, not to mention ball boys and girls.

Technology could make line judges obsolete.
Photo by: GETTY IMAGES
Why, when the chair umpire can overrule their calls, and instant replay is available, does tennis not just declutter the court?

Brad Gilbert, a former top player and well-known ESPN commentator, has called for just that. But he admits, like the umpire in baseball, lines officials are part of the cultural DNA of pro tennis and it will be tough to end.

He also says cost is an issue, because all but one of over 100 pro tennis events is yet to have instant replay on every court. The technology can cost upward of $80,000 per court for several weeks, while lines people might make a few hundred dollars per day.

But that begs the question: Why have the officials on those courts that do have replay — and many tournaments are expanding the use of the technology. And clay court events don’t have replay because the ball leaves a mark, so if replay is unnecessary why are lines people necessary?

Tennis is unlikely to change its approach because lines people are so deeply rooted in the pro game. Ironically, most of the players come up through the ranks of junior tennis calling their own lines without any referees or umpires. It is only when they get to the pros, where there often is instant replay, do they get lines officials.

— Daniel Kaplan

JEFF MEESON
Senior vice president, insights and strategies, Octagon

SUGGESTION: Use technology to resolve replays
“Replay in the NFL and MLB takes a long time, and is entirely subjective. Tennis gets it absolutely right. They use instant and transparent technology that is triggered on the field of play. What if the NFL and MLB limited replays to only those resolved by technology?”

SBJ Morning Buzzcast: April 24, 2024

Bears set to tell their story; WNBA teams seeing box-office surge; Orlando gets green light on $500M mixed-use plan

TNT’s Stan Van Gundy, ESPN’s Tim Reed, NBA Playoffs and NFL Draft

On this week’s pod, SBJ’s Austin Karp has two Big Get interviews. The first is with TNT’s Stan Van Gundy as he breaks down the NBA Playoffs from the booth. Later in the show, we hear from ESPN’s VP of Programming and Acquisitions Tim Reed as the NFL Draft gets set to kick off on Thursday night in Motown. SBJ’s Tom Friend also joins the show to share his insights into NBA viewership trends.

SBJ I Factor: Molly Mazzolini

SBJ I Factor features an interview with Molly Mazzolini. Elevate's Senior Operating Advisor – Design + Strategic Alliances chats with SBJ’s Ross Nethery about the power of taking chances. Mazzolini is a member of the SBJ Game Changers Class of 2016. She shares stories of her career including co-founding sports design consultancy Infinite Scale career journey and how a chance encounter while working at a stationery store launched her career in the sports industry. SBJ I Factor is a monthly podcast offering interviews with sports executives who have been recipients of one of the magazine’s awards.

Shareable URL copied to clipboard!

https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Journal/Issues/2017/04/17/In-Depth/Tennis.aspx

Sorry, something went wrong with the copy but here is the link for you.

https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Journal/Issues/2017/04/17/In-Depth/Tennis.aspx

CLOSE