Breaking Ground: Auburn addition Breaking Ground: Retractable-roof arena Arena seeks a name fit for a Palace Anschutz leads AEG’s new charge Diamondbacks pick Levy for retail Shining Star High schoolers get place next to pros Breaking Ground: Steadying Centerplate High-end suites for Coliseum? Spotting the trends
SBJ/Nov. 4-10, 2013/Facilities
Idea was considered in other arena designs
Published November 4, 2013, Page 33
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
Ten years ago, sports architects Tom Tingle and George Heinlein proposed bridge-style seating for new arena projects in Charlotte and Sacramento. For various reasons, including arena funding issues in California, those ideas never gained traction.
Facilities reporter Don Muret describes the renovated Madison Square Garden.
“It is a great concept but a very expensive and complicated construction,” said Bob Hunter, chief facilities and live entertainment officer for Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, the arena’s owner. “We abandoned the idea because of that.”
The Golden State Warriors are developing a new arena — and even showcase the Golden Gate Bridge in their logo — but are not considering bridge seats as part of their project, team President Rick Welts said. The Kings, meanwhile, are still determining the right mix of premium seats in their latest effort to build a new arena. To this point, nothing is final for their $448 million project, said Jon Niemuth, AECOM’s principal-in-charge of the project.
AECOM officials have discussed the MSG renovation with a few NBA clients, Niemuth said, and those teams are quick to point out they don’t believe the economics tied to the project in general would work in Sacramento or, for example, in Minneapolis and Salt Lake City.
“There are many interesting features of MSG that because of the New York marketplace really do not have application in other places,” Niemuth said. “They don’t have the volume [of corporate business] or pricing to support it.”