Conversations at Villanova symposium Tribeca/ESPN link gives sports docs a home Rogers Media sees brighter future Sports Media: ‘Chuck’ to be profitable First Look podcast: NFL-Amazon and more Sports Media: The many hats of McManus Five things to know about NFL-Amazon McManus confident in Romo Four more years for ‘Hard Knocks’ Tourney means teamwork for CBS-Turner
Upcoming Conferences and Events
May 31 - Jun 1
SBJ/Aug. 5-11, 2013/Media
Channel filled a hole in market
Published August 5, 2013, Page 34
■ How do you feel about Fox Sports 1? Do you view Speed as your baby? Or is it just business?
■ What do you mean?
WERNER: All the networks I’ve designed and built tried to be unique and offer something that was differentiated from broadcast. What’s happened now is that as the difficulty in getting increased subscriber fees increases, most programmers are becoming more dependent on the Nielsen meter and on ad sales for the bulk of their top line growth. The industry is devolving into a bigger version of the old three-network broadcast model, where everybody knocked off everybody else. If one sitcom worked, within months there were two more on the other two networks that looked just like it. Everybody is just chasing gross ratings points. As a guy who’s been in the industry from its earliest days, that’s somewhat disappointing. I always thought the opportunity here was to create things that were new and unique and exclusive and had real tangible value to the audience, not just more of the same.
■ How did you develop the idea for Speedvision?
WERNER: Back in the early 1980s, when I was COO at ESPN, we were trying to find some programming franchises that we could build that were unique and that could establish us as a leader. One of my personal passions was motorsports. There was very little on television other than the Indy 500 and the Daytona 500 back in the early 1980s. So we acquired the rights to Formula One and IndyCar and a number of NASCAR events and sports car series events. We had short-track racing live on Thursday nights. We launched a weekly racing news and highlight program. We effectively dominated that category. That was one of the programming decisions that I feel was instrumental in the development of ESPN and its early success.
■ How did that turn into Speedvision?
WERNER: Over the course of the 1990s, ESPN slowly walked away from the motorsports franchise to get bigger and stronger in things like football and baseball. I thought that there was an opportunity for a dedicated motorsports channel since a lot of the stuff that ESPN had done was not being done anymore, certainly not being promoted. I felt there was a hole in the market, and I could go back to my old friends in the racing industry and build a product that would satisfy them and the millions of consumers that liked that stuff.
■ How will Speed be remembered?
WERNER: That original channel was the most successful consumer product that I’ve ever been associated with in 40 years of being in the packaged goods and media business. That product resonated with its target audience like nothing else I’ve ever seen.