Skipper: There’s no liberal bias at ESPN Lawsuits target Duke, Notre Dame Execs warm to idea of President Trump L.A. should stay optimistic, experts say Republicans, NFL push back Election 2016 should mean big ad sales Ex-athletes more likely to take a stand Trump’s ‘America First’ may affect bids Election 2016 a political minefield NFLPA’s One Team PAC is a first
SBJ/July 15-21, 2013/Law and Politics
Order offers hope for progress in concussion case
Published July 15, 2013, Page 10
Instead, Judge Anita Brody last week switched gears and ordered the parties to mediation, forestalling her decision until at least Sept. 3.
The move left some observers cautiously hopeful that a long-expected legal slog that could consume up to a decade might end instead with a quick settlement.
“The order will put pressure on the league to seriously consider its position in the case,” said Cal Burnton, a liability lawyer with the firm Edwards Wildman. “If the motions [to dismiss] are denied, even in part, discovery will proceed, and the players will get access to all of the league’s internal documents.
“The league’s bargaining position is now at its highest,” Burnton said. “Once discovery begins, the players will have a much stronger hand. The league also has to ask, What is its end game? Certainly it wants to avoid a [Big] Tobacco-type of resolution. If the documents are as ‘bad’ for the league as the players’ lawyers hope, then a tobacco-type of resolution could be demanded.”
The NFL argues the claims should be handled under the dispute-resolution mechanisms of the collective-bargaining agreements in place when the former players competed. The players contend the NFL hid the risk of concussions and that their injuries were not contemplated under the CBAs.
Adding to the case’s complexities, if Brody were to let the case proceed, discovery could take years as the league interviews each player about his injury history, from youth though high school football and on to the pros. Some players may not live that long given their conditions.
And even before the NFL could opt to settle, it would need to know how much its insurance carriers will pay, and right now, the league is engaged in a legal battle with them over that liability. The carriers sued the league seeking to avoid liability coverage.
Many observers are not as hopeful as Burnton. Gabe Feldman, director of Tulane University sports law program, said the case is too complicated for a quick settlement
“At this stage of the game, it is too early and the gap is too large,” he said. “The biggest stumbling block is the NFL likely believes it has a strong case.”