From The Executive Editor: Greg Norman Cartoon: Air ball From the Field of Sports Collectibles Miller’s advice on law school Helping identify ideal job candidates Cartoon: Leadership flameout Rule 40 and the forecast for Rio 2016 From The Executive Editor: Ebersol story Are we serious about diversity? From The Executive Editor: 2nd thoughts
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBJ/June 11-17, 2012/Opinion
Protecting IP must pair with any sports organization’s branding
Published June 11, 2012, Page 13
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
Even sports leagues have adjusted their branding strategy in hopes of attracting a broader audience base. The UFC is a prime example. With the seven-year deal it signed with Fox, UFC programming is finally reaching beyond the pay-per-view and cable network viewers. With this expansion into the general populace comes the hope for greater ticket sales, higher pay-per-view subscriptions and ultimately increased merchandising revenue. The UFC sells everything from toy Brock Lesnar action figures, to the Octagon line of performance apparel, to trading cards. But beyond methodically expanding its revenue stream, the leader in all things MMA is also focused on the fact that its primary asset is its intellectual property.
We mustn’t leave out the athletes themselves. With Top Rank taking at least some of the reins when it comes to the marketing and ultimately the branding of world-renowned boxer and politico Manny Pacquiao, even athletes are a brand unto themselves.
With great success in branding and rebranding an image comes the inevitable question: Now what? While most recognize that their brand name and image are valuable, some may not realize that it can be one of their most valuable assets. And, like with any other asset, teams need to document, secure and protect that asset.
|UFC is one example of a sports league expanding into apparel, equipment and licensed goods to attract a broader audience.
Now that a team has everything neatly documented and organized, how does it go about securing it? The first basic step in securing a brand is to register it. Seems simple enough, and in most cases, it is. But particularly with a rebranding of an image, that process needs to be planned out and implemented based on a well-thought-out strategy. Some questions to consider:
• Can a team file trademark and copyright applications before the first game where the uniforms and helmets are debuted?
• Where should it register — in the state where they’re located, federally, worldwide?
• Aside from uniforms and helmets, will the new logo be on foam fingers, flags and cups? If so, should the logo be registered for these other products as well?
• What’s the benefit in that — if a team owns the logo, doesn’t the team own it for everything?
This is where a seasoned intellectual property attorney comes in handy. Because isn’t “intellectual property” just another fancy word for a brand name? Yes, but “brand name” is a much broader concept and more valuable asset than most realize, making its protection critical.
Once a team has documented who owns what, it’s begun the process of securing and registering the brand, how does it go about protecting that brand? The team and its IP attorney need to map out an anti-counterfeiting program. This can range from a simple approach of subscribing to watch reports — wherein a vendor watches for domain names and trademarks that are being registered that are similar, as well as monitoring common e-commerce sites — to recording registrations with U.S. Customs to prevent the importation of counterfeit products or “gray market goods.” These are goods that are legitimately bought by an authorized overseas manufacturer, but imported and sold domestically without the IP owners’ permission, undercutting U.S. distributors. How simple or complex the approach in protecting one’s IP depends on the temperament of the brand owner. But without the last step of protecting a brand, a team’s efforts to document and secure may all be for naught. Because as counterfeiters and sellers of gray market products eat away at the good will and recognition the team has developed in the brand, the more difficult it is ultimately to control and monetize its IP.
So, before a team conjures images of itself basking in the glow of a successful branding or rebranding project, it must ask: Have we done what’s necessary to document, secure and protect that new image?
Jennifer Ko Craft (firstname.lastname@example.org) is a shareholder and chairman of both the intellectual property and entertainment and sports law practice groups at Gordon Silver.