‘Daytona Day’ back with new activation MLS sponsor loyalty: Coke bubbles up Baker to chair sports group at O’Melveny Suns’ strategy? Take a look (in VR) IndyCar steers marketing toward digital NBPA bets on power of its stars Coast to Coast How Clemson nails it on social media Fewer seats mean greater value in Miami CFP notebook: More Culpepper
SBJ/August 15-21, 2011/Events and AttractionsPrint All
Organizers of a proposed NBA player exhibition tour in China have pushed back tentative dates and must win approval from the Chinese Basketball Association before they move forward with a two-week, three-city tour amid the NBA lockout.
Bruce O’Neil, founder and president of the United States Basketball Academy and consultant to the Chinese Basketball Association, has been retained by Wasserman Media Group to organize the tour and is now negotiating with Chinese promoters in Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Foshan in southern China to play in October instead of an earlier mid-August or September timetable.
O’Neil and Wasserman this spring began floating the idea of an exhibition tour during the lockout involving some of the 50 players it represents. As the NBA lockout drags into its sixth week, the proposed tour’s structure also has changed from its initial four-city, four-team tournament involving both CBA and NBA players to a tour that includes three teams made up of approximately 30 NBA players and one team of Chinese players playing a total of nine games in October. Cities initially targeted were Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. O’Neil is also hoping to attract sponsors and a television partner for the tour, but no deals have been secured.
But any chance of the tour happening hinges upon approval from the Chinese Basketball Association, which is expected to restrict the influx of NBA players coming to China during the lockout.
“The big key right now is getting the approval to move forward,” O’Neil said. “The concept has changed because of the sponsorship availability, and the [Chinese Basketball Association] still hasn’t decided how it will handle any NBA players.”
The tour also could include some NBA players not represented by Wasserman, but O’Neil would not disclose any player names.
Led by Arn Tellem, Wasserman’s player representation division includes Chicago’s Derrick Rose, Atlanta’s Joe Johnson and and Oklahoma City’s Russell Westbrook.
Wasserman officials would not comment.
The proposed tour in China allows players to cash paychecks during the lockout while sidestepping signing contracts with overseas basketball teams.
FIBA recently cleared NBA players to play overseas with the mandate that they return to their NBA teams after the lockout is lifted.
Arranging the tour in China is fraught with its own challenges in dealing with the Chinese Basketball Association, which one player agent said does not favor its teams hiring a flood of locked-out NBA players looking for temporary employment. Also, FIBA’s men’s basketball Asian Games are set for late September in China, and the Chinese Basketball Association season starts in mid-October.
“We are working hard on it and we are cautiously optimistic,” O’Neil said.
Staff writer Liz Mullen contributed to this report.
Last month, Shawn Hunter marveled at the scene on l’Alpe d’Huez, the Tour de France’s most famous mountain road.
Half a million spectators crammed the eight-mile stretch, and thousands had camped there overnight. Television cameras pointed at each of the 21 hairpin turns.
The Amgen Tour of California is still climbing the hill toward profitability, sources say.
“It’s hard to share what it’s like, looking at a million spectators standing on a mountainside, with someone else,” said Hunter, who is CEO and co-chairman of the Colorado race. “I thought, if we could only bottle this scene and take it back to Denver, we could show people how exciting bicycle racing can be.”
With an operating budget of $10 million, the eight-day Colorado race that starts next week will be significantly smaller than the 21-day Tour de France, which has an estimated operating budget of $100 million and is thought to net $30 million to $50 million in profit, the majority from TV rights.
But Hunter hopes to recreate the feeling of the French Alps in Colorado. With its inaugural race, the USA Pro Cycling Challenge will become America’s second-largest bicycle event, behind the Amgen Tour of California, which has an operating budget of $12 million, sources said. Many of the same elite cyclists competing in France, including the top-three overall finishers, will also race in Colorado. Every stage of the Colorado race will be shown live on Versus. While Versus’ rights did not include a rights fee, Hunter was able to negotiate international television deals which will bring in combined revenue in the mid-six figure range, sources said.
Sources close to the race say cities hosting the start and finish stages are paying mid-five- to low-six-figure sums to participate. Hunter has developed a sponsorship portfolio that includes Nissan, RadioShack, Waste Management, United Health Care, Kroger, Coca-Cola and Exergy Energy. Sources said sandwich maker Quiznos and burger chain Smashburger, which are owned by race owner Rick Schaden, are contributing $1.5 million each in sponsorship, which is the high end of sponsorship fees.
Hunter (center) with USA Pro Cycling Challenge owner Rick Schaden and Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper
But the path to profitability is a tall task. For nearly three decades, American executives such as Hunter have attempted to recreate the success of European bicycle racing, and make the business profitable. They organized multiday stage races, such as the Coors Classic, Tour duPont and Tour de Georgia. But due to the inherent challenges posed by the business model of road bicycle racing, these events lasted a fraction as long as the Tour, which was first held in 1903.
In fact, the U.S. has only five races sanctioned by the sport’s international governing body, the Union Cycliste International.
“The consistent failure is due to the same problem. You gotta be willing to lose a lot of money for a long time,” said David Chauner, who started America’s first major international race, Philadelphia’s TD Bank International, which this year celebrated its 27th anniversary. “There is no real revenue model that makes sense.”
Major bicycle races do not generate gate receipts. Television audiences in the United States are growing, but comparatively small to those from the major sports, so lucrative rights fees are not part of the equation. No major American races earn a rights fee for nationwide TV coverage, a source said. Revenue is generated almost entirely by sponsorship dollars, or fees paid by municipalities where the races start and finish.
But bicycle racing reaches a desirable demographic. According to Versus, the median household income is $78,000, the top income figure for any of its sports. And Versus’ Tour viewership has risen 25 percent since 2008.
The United States has three major international stage races — the tours of California and Utah and the USA Pro Cycling Challenge — and three major one-day events. A smattering of domestic pro and amateur races, which are sustained largely by participant entry fees, also exist.
Overhead costs for the major races add up. Riders occasionally charge appearance fees. A race must house and feed the teams, as well as their staff. It must pay out a prize purse that is designated by the UCI. An organizer must also close miles of public roadway, and pay local law enforcement wages to do so. Local politics decides how much communities will give, or charge.
Both the Tour de Georgia, which ran from 2003-08, and Tour of Missouri, which ran from 2007-09, were born out of the state legislatures looking to grow the visibility of their state, and both races folded after changes in administration. The one-day San Francisco Grand Prix, which ran from 2001-05 and operated on a $1.3 million budget, could no longer cover its costs after the city of San Francisco asked the race to pay for $350,000 in police and road services.
According to numerous sources, major American bicycle races often depend on a financial backer whose passion for the sport outweighs the losses in revenue.
“It takes a visionary, it takes a person who believes in the sport and sees what it can give back to the community,” said Jim Birrell, whose Medalist Sports company organizes the operating logistics for the Tours of California and Utah, as well as the Colorado race.
Sources familiar with the Tour of California, which has yet to break even since its debut in 2006, said the race has survived in part due to AEG Founder Phil Anschutz’s affinity for cycling. Title sponsor Amgen, which in early August renewed its mid seven-figure deal for two more years, uses the event to promote its Breakaway from Cancer charity. This is also the case with the Tour of Utah, which is backed by the Larry H. Miller Group. The race, which started in 2004, has slowly grown its operating budget to $2.5 million, sources said, and its evolution has been driven in part by Miller’s son Greg, who is an advocate of health and fitness.
Sources close to the USA Pro Cycling Challenge said race owner Rick Schaden and his father, Rich, have already committed $10 million of their own money to the race. The race declined to make either Schaden available for comment. Hunter said the sponsorship from the race will cover more than half of the operating budget the first year.
Jonathan Vaughters, manager of the Garmin-Cervelo pro cycling team and a former pro rider, said the sport has long relied on wealthy patrons to keep it afloat in the United States. However, he believes the sport should move away from that model.
“In order for the sport to grow, we need to be seen as an investment, and not a donation,” Vaughters said. “Investors want to see the possibility of profitability.” Vaughters said the industry should seek investment from the private equity sector, but should first address problems with doping and instability at the team level.
There are numerous opinions for how the sport can create a profitable model. Several promoters interviewed for this story believe that holding mass-participant events in conjunction with the pro race can generate interest and registration revenue. The 2011 Tour of California featured a 100-mile amateur ride a week before the pro race. Called l’Etape du California, the event attracted 1,000 participants who paid $125 each to participate.
Michael Aisner, who owned and operated the Coors Classic from 1980 until 1988, said races should invest more in retail and merchandise sales. Aisner said that in 1987, the Coors Classic generated $1.5 million in merchandise sales, which covered nearly half the race’s expenses. He also said organizers need to keep their budgets and salaries in check.
“When I ran a race I made a salary that was probably great for a school teacher,” Aisner said.
Chauner believes the key is to keep infrastructure costs down by holding races on smaller courses. He envisions holding a velodrome-style series of races on shorter road courses, which would enable promoters to charge entry fees to spectators. “Shorter criteriums aren’t nearly as expensive to put on, and the racing is more exciting,” Chauner said. “The problem is that everyone is trying to recreate the [Tour de France].”
Hunter believes the key is to find companies willing to make long-term commitments, such as Amgen. A source familiar with the Tour of California said the race’s losses this year were less than $1 million, and predicted the race could even turn a profit in 2012. Hunter believes the USA Pro Cycling Challenge will break even in just three years.
“As our race grows, we’ll see the economic footprint grow, and the rights fees will grow,” Hunter said. “We want to focus on making sure the race will be around for a long time.”