Menu
In-Depth

Jarnecke charts course for NCAA tourney

Few NCAA championships attract crowds as large as lacrosse. More than 117,000 packed M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore over three days last year for the Division I and II championships, and the Division I semifinals have been known to draw as many as 50,000 or more. The man behind the lacrosse championships is Jeff Jarnecke, an associate director at the NCAA since 2005. He recently discussed the growth of the lacrosse championship, and what the event's future holds, with staff writer Michael Smith.

GETTY IMAGES
Duke players celebrate winning the 2010 Division I championship.

With attendance now solidly in the 40,000 to 50,000 range for each day of your Division I final four, where does lacrosse rank among the NCAA's best-attended events?

JARNECKE: Well, you've got the men's College World Series at over 300,000 over a much longer period of time (10 days) and certainly the men's basketball Final Four does very well. But as a three-day weekend, the lacrosse championships are right up there. Those numbers compare favorably with our top events for the association.

How does the attendance and tickets break down?

Jarnecke
JARNECKE: We work on a 12-month window, so we're selling for 2012 when we're at the 2011 final four. By the time we leave M&T Bank Stadium after the final four this year, we will have hopefully sold 10,000 to 15,000 tickets for next year. It's the impulse, the excitement and looking forward to that next year. It's a huge element to kicking off our ticket sales, for we put a lot of resources around that. … Overall, we have a base of about 30,000 to 35,000 core fans that we think follow the championship regardless of where it is or what teams are competing. The ultimate goal is to grow that core audience and get to the point where we're selling out or approaching a sellout without any concern over where we are or the teams competing.


What about the competing schools?

JARNECKE: We hold back 750 tickets for each school to specifically create their own blocks. Some return some of the tickets, while others request more tickets. … And there's also a pretty good walk-up crowd that, the last two years, has been trending up. You're dealing with a holiday weekend (Memorial Day), so what we're trying to do is build this into an event that's about more than just the games and make it an experience and a great way to celebrate the holiday weekend.

How are ticket sales for this year's championship trending?

JARNECKE: Slightly ahead of last year, so we're very encouraged. We're in a better position for sales overall, so maybe there will be less of a walk-up.

Attendance in the early rounds, however, has been a challenge. How do you increase those numbers?

JARNECKE: We're looking at a number of different strategies. The preliminary rounds are played at the home site of the top eight seeds on campus and we're considering predetermined sites where four teams would travel and play doubleheaders. We'd have to be very strategic about where we placed those predetermined sites and the four teams we sent there, but we'd look for areas that are hotbeds for the sport and could draw well. We're discussing this with the coaches association now. It would be a way to take the sport to other areas, help grow the game and at the same time help develop the strong and powerful brand of NCAA lacrosse.

At what point do you start taking a hard look at moving the championship out of the traditional rotation of Philadelphia, Baltimore and Boston?

JARNECKE: The good thing is that there's a lot of interest from groups looking to host the championships, but I'd say we're at least three to five years away from moving the finals site. I think we'd rather look at some other sites maybe for the quarterfinal round to see how they do there first. We think there are opportunities at places like Columbus, Ohio; South Bend; Denver — areas that might be somewhat nontraditional, but could draw well. In the quarterfinals, we could look to go into facilities that are 15,000 to 30,000, like we're doing next year in PPL Park.

Is the strategy behind keeping the men's and women's final fours separate going to stay in place?

JARNECKE: I think so, at this point. The two committees (men's and women's) have discussed it and it's going to be an interesting year with the women going to Stony Brook for the first time. We had record attendance for last year's championship (at nearly 10,000) and ticket sales have been stronger than last year. … By putting the championships together, you would have some efficiencies, but we think there's enough of a different audience to keep them the way they are.

Lacrosse is pushing more to the West and the South. How important is it to the college game to have some nontraditional teams make a run?

JARNECKE: It's always exciting for the sport when you have a new team in there. It grows the attention around it, it can help grow the fan base, it becomes a new conversation in media outlets.

What kind of response have you seen from the NCAA's corporate champions and partners to the lacrosse championship?

JARNECKE: It's been tremendous. We might have a title sponsor for the fan fest for the first time. We're working on plans and a layout that's much larger than what we've had the last number of years. We're also talking about a new retail initiative as well and that would put merchandise and equipment in a mega-tent. That's something we haven't tried before.

NCAA Division I men's lacrosse championships

Attendance
YEAR FINALS SEMIFINALS SITE
 2010    37,126    44,389    Baltimore  
 2009    41,935    36,594    Foxboro  
 2008    48,970    48,224    Foxboro  
 2007    48,443    52,004    Baltimore  
 2006    47,062    49,562    Philadelphia  
 2005    44,920    45,275    Philadelphia  

 

Future NCAA SITES
 2011    Baltimore    2013    Philadelphia  
 2012    Foxboro    2014    Baltimore  

Source: NCAA

Other prominent college lacrosse events

Konica Minolta Face -Off Classic *
 Year    Attend.    Site  
 2011    17,057    Baltimore  
 2010    19,742    Baltimore  
 2009    17,119    Baltimore  
 2008    19,165    Baltimore  
 2007    20,130    Baltimore  

* Tripleheader

Konica Minolta Big City Classic *
 Year    Attend.    Site  
 2011    25,115    EastRutherford,N.J.  
 2010    25,710    EastRutherford,N.J.  
 2009    22,308    EastRutherford,N.J.  

* Tripleheader

Smartlink Day of Rivals #
 Year    Attend.    Site  
 2010    20,911    Baltimore  
 2009    20,732    Baltimore  

# Doubleheader

Note: There is no Day of Rivals scheduled for the 2011 season
Source: Inside Lacrosse

SBJ Morning Buzzcast: April 24, 2024

Bears set to tell their story; WNBA teams seeing box-office surge; Orlando gets green light on $500M mixed-use plan

TNT’s Stan Van Gundy, ESPN’s Tim Reed, NBA Playoffs and NFL Draft

On this week’s pod, SBJ’s Austin Karp has two Big Get interviews. The first is with TNT’s Stan Van Gundy as he breaks down the NBA Playoffs from the booth. Later in the show, we hear from ESPN’s VP of Programming and Acquisitions Tim Reed as the NFL Draft gets set to kick off on Thursday night in Motown. SBJ’s Tom Friend also joins the show to share his insights into NBA viewership trends.

SBJ I Factor: Molly Mazzolini

SBJ I Factor features an interview with Molly Mazzolini. Elevate's Senior Operating Advisor – Design + Strategic Alliances chats with SBJ’s Ross Nethery about the power of taking chances. Mazzolini is a member of the SBJ Game Changers Class of 2016. She shares stories of her career including co-founding sports design consultancy Infinite Scale career journey and how a chance encounter while working at a stationery store launched her career in the sports industry. SBJ I Factor is a monthly podcast offering interviews with sports executives who have been recipients of one of the magazine’s awards.

Shareable URL copied to clipboard!

https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Journal/Issues/2011/05/02/In-Depth/NCAA-lacrosse.aspx

Sorry, something went wrong with the copy but here is the link for you.

https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Journal/Issues/2011/05/02/In-Depth/NCAA-lacrosse.aspx

CLOSE